Intelligent Operations CenterApplication · Ibm

CVE-2019-4067

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-06-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.2.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Intelligent Operations Center (IOC) 5.1.0 through 5.2.0 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 157012.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Intelligent Operations Center (IOC) versions 5.1.0 through 5.2.0 does not enforce strong password requirements by default, allowing users to set weak passwords that are susceptible to brute-force or dictionary attacks, facilitating easier account compromise.

MitigationEnable and configure strong password policies in IBM IOC including minimum length, complexity requirements, password expiration, and account lockout thresholds.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Intelligent Operations CenterApplication
Affected:>= 5.1.0, <= 5.2.0
Intelligent Operations Center For Emergency ManagementApplication
Affected:>= 5.1.0, <= 5.1.0.6
Water Operations For WaternamicsApplication
Affected:>= 5.1.0, <= 5.2.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm installed IBM IOC version
    Locate the IBM Intelligent Operations Center installation and identify the exact version number. This is typically found in the product's About section, version manifest, or installation directory metadata.
    Affected if Version is 5.1.0 through 5.2.0 for base IOC, 5.1.0 through 5.1.0.6 for Emergency Management, or 5.1.0 through 5.2.1.1 for Water Operations For Waternamics.
  2. Verify password policy configuration exists
    Access the IBM IOC administrative console or configuration files and locate the password policy settings. Look for password security configuration sections in the system administration or security settings.
    Affected if Password policy settings are not explicitly defined or remain at default values.
  3. Check minimum password length setting
    Inspect the password policy configuration for the minimum length requirement parameter. This is usually found in security policy settings or password validation configuration.
    Affected if Minimum length is set to a weak value (such as less than 8 characters) or is not configured.
  4. Check password complexity requirements
    Examine whether password complexity rules are enabled in the security configuration. Look for settings requiring uppercase, lowercase, numeric, and special characters.
    Affected if Complexity requirements are disabled or not defined.
  5. Check account lockout configuration
    Review the account lockout or account disabling settings in the security policy. Look for parameters controlling failed login attempts and lockout duration.
    Affected if Account lockout thresholds are not configured or are set to overly permissive values (such as no lockout on failed attempts).

You are affected if your IBM IOC version falls within the listed ranges AND strong password policies (minimum length, complexity, expiration, lockout) are not explicitly configured and enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.2.1.1
Interim mitigation

Enable and configure strong password policies in IBM IOC including minimum length, complexity requirements, password expiration, and account lockout thresholds.

Fix this in Intelligent Operations Center Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-4067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-4067 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data