Security Information QueueApplication · Ibm

CVE-2019-4219

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Developing Published 2019-06-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Information Queue (ISIQ) 1.0.0, 1.0.1, and 1.0.2 generates an error message that includes sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 159228.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · low confidence

IBM Security Information Queue (ISIQ) versions 1.0.0, 1.0.1, and 1.0.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where the application generates verbose error messages that expose sensitive information, which could be leveraged by attackers for further exploitation of the system.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of ISIQ if available, or implement custom error handling to sanitize error messages and prevent sensitive data from being displayed to users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Information QueueApplication
Affected:= 1.0.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ISIQ installation and version
    Locate the ISIQ installation directory and check the version file or product metadata. Common locations include /opt/isiq or the installation root directory. Look for a version manifest, README, or product.info file that states the installed version.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0, 1.0.1, or 1.0.2
  2. Check application error handling configuration
    Examine the ISIQ configuration files for error handling settings. Look for parameters related to error display, debug mode, or verbose output in configuration files such as config.xml, application.properties, or similar.
    Affected if Error handling is configured to display full stack traces, detailed error messages, or debug information to end users
  3. Trigger a test error condition
    Introduce a deliberate invalid input or action that will cause ISIQ to generate an error response. Observe the HTTP response or user interface output for any sensitive information such as file paths, database connection strings, system details, or stack traces.
    Affected if The error response contains sensitive system information, full stack traces, internal paths, or configuration details that should not be exposed to users
  4. Review server logs for exposed information
    Examine ISIQ server logs, typically found in a logs/ directory within the installation. Check if log entries contain sensitive data or verbose error details that could be accessed by unauthorized users.
    Affected if Logs contain excessive sensitive information or verbose error details accessible to unauthorized parties

You are affected if ISIQ version 1.0.0, 1.0.1, or 1.0.2 is installed and verbose error messages are being displayed to users or accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of ISIQ if available, or implement custom error handling to sanitize error messages and prevent sensitive data from being displayed to users.

Fix this in Security Information Queue Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-4219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-4219 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data