Security Guardium Big Data IntelligenceApplication · Ibm

CVE-2019-4340

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-08-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence 4.0 (SonarG) is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 161419.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence 4.0 (SonarG) is vulnerable to XML External Entity Injection (XXE) when processing XML data. A remote attacker can exploit this to read sensitive files from the server or cause memory exhaustion (Denial of Service).

MitigationDisable external entity processing in XML parsers, implement strict input validation for XML data, and apply vendor patches when available. Use less complex XML parsers and disable DTD processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Guardium Big Data IntelligenceApplication
Affected:= 4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence installation
    Locate the Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) installation directory and check for version information files or use system inventory tools to identify if the product is installed.
    Affected if IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence version 4.0 is installed.
  2. Confirm installed version is 4.0
    Check the product version by examining version files in the installation directory, using the product's built-in version command, or querying the software inventory.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.0.
  3. Identify XML processing components
    Search for XML parser libraries or modules within the Guardium Big Data Intelligence installation directory, particularly in lib, bin, or configuration folders.
    Affected if XML parsing libraries or components are present in the installation.
  4. Check for XML data intake features
    Inspect the product configuration for any XML import, upload, or data processing capabilities, particularly features that accept XML files or XML-formatted data streams.
    Affected if XML data import or processing features are enabled or configurable.
  5. Review XML parser configuration
    Examine XML parser configuration files or settings within the product to determine if external entity processing (DTD processing) is allowed or enabled.
    Affected if External entity processing or DTD processing is enabled in the XML parser configuration.

A user is affected if IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence version 4.0 is installed and XML data processing features with external entity support are in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable external entity processing in XML parsers, implement strict input validation for XML data, and apply vendor patches when available. Use less complex XML parsers and disable DTD processing.

Fix this in Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-4340 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-4340 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data