Aspose.cellsApplication · Aspose

CVE-2019-5032

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-08-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An exploitable out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the LabelSst record parser of Aspose Aspose.Cells 19.1.0 library. A specially crafted XLS file can cause an out-of-bounds read, resulting in remote code execution. An attacker needs to provide a malformed file to the victim to trigger the vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the LabelSst record parser of the Aspen.Aspose.Cells 19.1.0 library when processing specially crafted XLS files. The parser fails to properly validate bounds when reading label data from the shared string table (SST), allowing memory to be read beyond allocated buffers. This can be triggered by tricking a user into opening a malicious XLS file, potentially leading to remote code execution.

MitigationUpdate Aspen.Aspose.Cells to the latest version containing the vendor patch for this vulnerability. Until patched, avoid opening untrusted XLS files with the affected library and implement additional file validation at the application layer.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Aspose.cellsApplication
Affected:= 19.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed version of the library
    Check your project dependencies or the installed DLL version for 'Aspose.Cells' - examine the assembly metadata or NuGet package reference to confirm the exact version number
    Affected if The installed version is 19.1.0 exactly, as this is the only version listed as affected by this CVE
  2. Confirm the library processes XLS files
    Review your application code to determine if it uses the library to open, parse, or render .xls file formats - look for calls to workbook.Open() or similar methods with XLS file paths
    Affected if Your application loads XLS files using the vulnerable library, as the flaw is in the LabelSst record parser specific to XLS format processing
  3. Verify the LabelSst record parsing is invoked
    When opening an XLS file, the library internally parses the Shared String Table (SST) which contains LabelSst records - this occurs automatically during file loading if the XLS contains label data in the SST
    Affected if The XLS file being processed contains label data in the Shared String Table (SST), triggering the vulnerable parsing code path
  4. Check application-layer file validation
    Determine whether your application performs any pre-processing validation on XLS files before passing them to the library (such as file format魔术检查或 schema validation)
    Affected if No additional file validation is performed and untrusted XLS files are loaded directly, allowing the specially crafted file to reach the vulnerable parser

You are affected if you are using exactly version 19.1.0 of the library and your application uses it to process XLS files containing SST label data from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Aspen.Aspose.Cells to the latest version containing the vendor patch for this vulnerability. Until patched, avoid opening untrusted XLS files with the affected library and implement additional file validation at the application layer.

Fix this in Aspose.cells Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5032 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5032 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data