CVE-2019-5282
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBastet module of some Huawei smartphones with Versions earlier than Emily-AL00A 9.0.0.182(C00E82R1P21), Versions earlier than Emily-TL00B 9.0.0.182(C01E82R1P21), Versions earlier than Emily-L09C 9.0.0.203(C432E7R1P11), Versions earlier than Emily-L29C 9.0.0.203(C432E7R1P11), Versions earlier than Emily-L29C 9.0.0.202(C185E2R1P12) have a double free vulnerability. An attacker tricks the user into installing a malicious application, which frees on the same memory address twice. Successful exploit could result in malicious code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA double free vulnerability exists in the Bastet module of certain Huawei smartphones (Emily-AL00A, Emily-TL00B, Emily-L09C, Emily-L29C). An attacker tricks users into installing a malicious application that frees the same memory address twice, which can lead to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< emily-al00a_9.0.0.182\(c00e82r1p21\)< emily-tl00b_9.0.0.182\(c01e82r1p21\)< emily-l09c_9.0.0.203\(c432e7r1p11\)< emily-l29c_9.0.0.203\(c432e7r1p11\)< emily-l29c_9.0.0.202\(c185e2r1p12\)< emily-l29c_9.0.0.207\(c636e7r1p13\)< emily-l29c_9.0.0.205\(c635e2r1p11\)< hima-l09ca_9.0.0.198\(c432e10r1p16\)< hima-l29ca_9.0.0.198\(c432e10r1p16\)< hima-l29c_9.0.0.204\(c636e10r2p1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelCheck the device settings or use 'AT+CGMM' or 'AT+CGSN' commands via UART or serial debug to confirm the model number is one of: Emily-AL00A, Emily-TL00B, Emily-L09C, Emily-L29C, Hima-L09ca, Hima-L29ca, or Hima-L29cAffected if Device model matches one of the listed affected model numbers
-
Check firmware version for Emily-AL00ANavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version or use 'AT+HVER' command to retrieve firmware version; compare against emily-al00a_9.0.0.182(c00e82r1p21)Affected if Firmware version is lower than 9.0.0.182(c00e82r1p21)
-
Check firmware version for Emily-TL00BNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version or use 'AT+HVER' command; compare against emily-tl00b_9.0.0.182(c01e82r1p21)Affected if Firmware version is lower than 9.0.0.182(c01e82r1p21)
-
Check firmware version for Emily-L09C or L29CNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version or use 'AT+HVER' command; for L09C compare against emily-l09c_9.0.0.203(c432e7r1p11); for L29C compare against the applicable version (9.0.0.203, 9.0.0.202, 9.0.0.207, or 9.0.0.205 depending on build)Affected if Firmware version is lower than the respective patched version for that variant
-
Check firmware version for Hima variantsNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version or use 'AT+HVER' command; for Hima-L09ca/L29ca compare against hima-l09ca_9.0.0.198(c432e10r1p16); for Hima-L29c compare against hima-l29c_9.0.0.204(c636e10r2p1)Affected if Firmware version is lower than the respective patched version for that Hima variant
The device is affected if it is one of the listed Huawei model variants AND its firmware version is below the specified patched version for that model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the device firmware to the patched versions (Emily-AL00A 9.0.0.182/C00E82R1P21, Emily-TL00B 9.0.0.182/C01E82R1P21, Emily-L09C 9.0.0.203/C432E7R1P11, Emily-L29C 9.0.0.203/C432E7R1P11 or later) and avoid installing applications from untrusted sources.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5282 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5282 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data