NexposeApplication · Rapid7

CVE-2019-5640

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-11-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.6.114 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Rapid7 Nexpose versions prior to 6.6.114 suffer from an information exposure issue whereby, when the user's session has ended due to inactivity, an attacker can use the inspect element browser feature to remove the login panel and view the details available in the last webpage visited by previous user

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Nexpose versions prior to 6.6.114, when a user's session times out due to inactivity, the login panel is displayed as an overlay without properly clearing the underlying page content from the DOM. An attacker with access to the browser can use developer tools to remove the login overlay and view sensitive details from the last webpage visited by the previous user.

MitigationUpgrade to Nexpose version 6.6.114 or later, which implements proper session termination that securely clears or removes previous page content from the client-side when the session ends.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NexposeApplication
Affected:< 6.6.114

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Nexpose version
    Locate the Nexpose instance and check its version number, typically found in the product UI (Help > About) or in version configuration files
    Affected if Version is shown as lower than 6.6.114
  2. Confirm product is Rapid7 Nexpose
    Verify the affected product is Rapid7 Nexpose (not another Rapid7 product)
    Affected if Product is Rapid7 Nexpose and version is below 6.6.114
  3. Test session timeout behavior
    Log into Nexpose, navigate to a page containing data, wait for session to timeout or manually trigger timeout, then use browser developer tools to inspect whether the previous page content remains in the DOM beneath the login overlay
    Affected if After session timeout, the login overlay appears but the underlying page DOM elements remain accessible and visible when the overlay is removed via developer tools

You are affected if running Rapid7 Nexpose version lower than 6.6.114 and session timeout leaves previous page content accessible in the DOM.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.6.114 or later
Fixed in 6.6.114
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Nexpose version 6.6.114 or later, which implements proper session termination that securely clears or removes previous page content from the client-side when the session ends.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

6.6.114

  1. Verify current Nexpose version by accessing the Nexpose console and checking the product version
  2. Download Nexpose version 6.6.114 or later from the Rapid7 customer portal at https://www.rapid7.com/products/nexpose/download/
  3. Follow standard Nexpose upgrade procedures: stop the Nexpose service, run the installer for the new version, and complete the upgrade wizard
  4. After upgrade, restart the Nexpose service
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the console shows version 6.6.114 or later
  6. Test that the login session timeout now properly clears cached page content

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Nexpose Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,290
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5640 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5640 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data