CVE-2019-5799
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect inheritance of a new document's policy in Content Security Policy in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Content Security Policy inheritance flaw in Google Chrome prior to version 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass CSP protections by crafting malicious HTML that incorrectly inherited or applied document policies, potentially enabling XSS or data injection attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 73.0.3683.75= sle-15= 15.0= 15.1= 42.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Chrome versionRun 'google-chrome --version' in terminal, or on Linux systems check the package manager: 'rpm -q google-chrome' or 'dpkg -l | grep google-chrome'Affected if The command fails (Chrome not installed) or returns a version lower than 73.0.3683.75
-
Verify Chrome browser presence on OpenSUSE systemsOn OpenSUSE Leap or Backports, run 'rpm -qa | grep -i chrome' or check Yast Software Management for installed Chrome packagesAffected if Google Chrome is installed on OpenSUSE Leap 15.0, 15.1, 42.3, or from sle-15 backports repo regardless of version
-
Confirm browser is actual Chrome (not Chromium)Navigate to chrome://version in the browser address bar and check the 'Browser' and 'Profile Path' lines, or run 'google-chrome --product-version'Affected if The browser reports itself as Google Chrome with version < 73.0.3683.75, as Chromium may have different patch timelines
A system is affected if Google Chrome (not Chromium) is installed with version less than 73.0.3683.75, or any Google Chrome package from the listed OpenSUSE versions/repos is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data73.0.3683.75
Update Google Chrome to version 73.0.3683.75 or later to patch the CSP inheritance vulnerability.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5799 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data