CVE-2019-6033
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting vulnerability in a-blog cms versions prior to Ver.2.10.23 (Ver.2.10.x), Ver.2.9.26 (Ver.2.9.x), and Ver.2.8.64 (Ver.2.8.x) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in a-blog cms allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML. The vulnerability affects versions prior to Ver.2.10.23 (2.10.x branch), Ver.2.9.26 (2.9.x branch), and Ver.2.8.64 (2.8.x branch). The specific injection point is not disclosed in the advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.64>= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6>= 2.10.0, < 2.10.23CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed a-blog cms versionCheck the version number in the admin dashboard (typically in the system information or site manager area), or look for a version file in the installation directory. The version is often displayed in the admin panel footer or in a version/config file.Affected if The version cannot be determined or is not visible in the expected locations.
-
Determine the branch and exact versionConfirm whether the installation is on the 2.8.x, 2.9.x, or 2.10.x branch and note the full version number (for example, 2.10.5 or 2.9.3).Affected if The branch or exact version number cannot be confirmed.
-
Compare against affected version rangesMatch your installed version to the following ranges: 2.8.x branch: >= 2.8.0 and < 2.8.64; 2.9.x branch: >= 2.9.0 and < 2.9.6; 2.10.x branch: >= 2.10.0 and < 2.10.23. If your version falls within any of these ranges, the environment is affected.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges (2.8.0 to 2.8.63, 2.9.0 to 2.9.5, or 2.10.0 to 2.10.22).
If the installed a-blog cms version is 2.8.0 to 2.8.63, 2.9.0 to 2.9.5, or 2.10.0 to 2.10.22, the environment is affected by this XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.8.642.9.62.10.23
Upgrade a-blog cms to version Ver.2.10.23 or later for the 2.10.x branch, Ver.2.9.26 or later for 2.9.x, or Ver.2.8.64 or later for 2.8.x. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data fields as a temporary mitigation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6033 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data