SuitecrmApplication · Salesagility

CVE-2019-6506

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SuiteCRM before 7.8.28, 7.9.x and 7.10.x before 7.10.15, and 7.11.x before 7.11.3 allows SQL Injection.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in SuiteCRM versions before 7.8.28, 7.10.15, and 7.11.3 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 indicates network-exploitable attacks with complete confidentiality and integrity impact.

MitigationUpgrade SuiteCRM to version 7.8.28, 7.10.15, or 7.11.3 or later to remediate the SQL injection vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SuitecrmApplication
Affected:= 7.11.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed SuiteCRM version
    Locate the version file (typically include/utils.php or cache/include/SuiteCRM/Version.php) and read the version string, or access /service/v4_1/rest.php and check the API response for version info
    Affected if The installed version is 7.11.0 or any version before 7.8.28, 7.10.15, or 7.11.3 (e.g., 7.10.x versions before 7.10.15, or 7.8.x versions before 7.8.28)
  2. Confirm SuiteCRM application is network-accessible
    Verify the SuiteCRM web application is reachable over the network (HTTP/HTTPS) from untrusted sources
    Affected if The application is exposed to the internet or untrusted internal networks without proper network segmentation
  3. Determine if unauthenticated access is allowed
    Test if the REST API endpoint (service/v4_1/rest.php or similar) accepts requests without providing valid authentication credentials
    Affected if Unauthenticated requests to the REST API are permitted without authentication tokens

You are affected if your installed SuiteCRM version is 7.11.0 or any version earlier than 7.8.28, 7.10.15, or 7.11.3 and the application is network-accessible to unauthenticated attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade SuiteCRM to version 7.8.28, 7.10.15, or 7.11.3 or later to remediate the SQL injection vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

7.11.3 or later (7.11.x branch)

  1. 1. Perform a full backup of the SuiteCRM database and all files
  2. 2. Download SuiteCRM version 7.11.3 or later (or the latest stable 7.11.x release) from the official repository
  3. 3. Extract the new version files, excluding the config.php and any custom configuration
  4. 4. Replace the existing SuiteCRM installation files with the new version files
  5. 5. Run the database repair/upgrade scripts if prompted (via Admin > Repair > Quick Repair and Rebuild
  6. 6. Clear the cache by deleting contents of cache/ directory
  7. 7. Verify the upgrade by logging in and checking the SuiteCRM version in Admin > About

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Suitecrm Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6506 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6506 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data