CVE-2019-6517
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBD FACSLyric Research Use Only, Windows 10 Professional Operating System, U.S. and Malaysian Releases, between November 2017 and November 2018 and BD FACSLyric IVD Windows 10 Professional Operating System US release does not properly enforce user access control to privileged accounts, which may allow for unauthorized access to administrative level functions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe BD FACSLyric flow cytometry system (both Research Use Only and IVD variants) running Windows 10 Professional fails to properly enforce user access controls for privileged accounts, potentially allowing unauthorized users to escalate privileges and access administrative-level functions that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm BD FACSLyric system presenceIdentify if your facility uses a BD FACSLyric flow cytometry instrument - check hardware inventory, instrument labeling, or BD software installation (FACSLyric software)Affected if You have a BD FACSLyric or BD FACSLyric IVD flow cytometry system in your environment
-
Verify Windows 10 Professional operating systemOn the instrument workstation, open Command Prompt or PowerShell and run: systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version" - or check System PropertiesAffected if The system is running Windows 10 Professional (the vulnerability applies specifically to this OS configuration)
-
Check user account types and group membershipsOpen Computer Management > Local Users and Groups > Groups. Review members of Administrators, Power Users, and Users groups. Run: net user on the instrument workstationAffected if Non-administrative users have been added to privileged groups (Administrators, Power Users) or have been granted admin-level permissions they should not have
-
Inspect local security policy access controlsRun secpol.msc or gpedit.msc on the instrument workstation. Navigate to Local Policies > User Rights Assignment. Review who can: Access this computer from the network, Allow log on locally, Shut down the system, and Manage auditing and security logAffected if Non-privileged users have been granted additional user rights that should be restricted to administrators only
-
Verify application-level access restrictionsCheck BD FACSLyric software configuration for any user role settings, admin function protections, or RBAC configurations within the BD software itself (consult BD documentation for software-specific settings)Affected if Administrative functions within the BD FACSLyric software are accessible to standard/non-privileged user accounts
Your environment is affected if you operate a BD FACSLyric or BD FACSLyric IVD system running Windows 10 Professional where non-administrative users can access privileged functions or have been granted elevated Windows permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches from BD and implement proper role-based access control (RBAC) configurations to ensure administrative functions are only accessible to authorized users. Coordinate with BD for medical device regulatory compliance requirements.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6517 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6517 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data