CVE-2019-6535
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMitsubishi Electric Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU: serial number 20081 and prior, Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU: serial number 20081 and prior, and Q03UDECPU, Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU: serial number 20101 and prior. A remote attacker can send specific bytes over Port 5007 that will result in an Ethernet stack crash and disruption to USB communication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA remote attacker can send specially crafted bytes to Port 5007 on affected Mitsubishi Electric Q-series PLC CPUs (Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU, Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU, Q03UDECPU, Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU), causing the Ethernet stack to crash and disrupting USB communication. This is a network-based denial-of-service vulnerability requiring no authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 20081<= 20081<= 20081<= 20081<= 20081<= 20081<= 20081<= 20081CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PLC modelAccess the PLC via GX Works2 or GX Developer and check the CPU model type in the system configuration. Alternatively, check the physical label on the CPU module for the model number (e.g., Q03UDVCPU, Q04UDVCPU, Q06UDVCPU, Q13UDVCPU, Q26UDVCPU, Q04UDPVCPU, Q06UDPVCPU, Q13UDPVCPU).Affected if The model matches any of these: Q03UDVCPU, Q04UDVCPU, Q06UDVCPU, Q13UDVCPU, Q26UDVCPU, Q04UDPVCPU, Q06UDPVCPU, Q13UDPVCPU, Q03UDECPU, Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU
-
Check firmware versionConnect to the PLC using GX Works2, go to the CPU module diagnostics, and retrieve the firmware version. Compare the displayed version number against the affected range.Affected if Firmware version is 20081 or lower (the CVE states affected versions are <= 20081)
-
Verify Ethernet port is configuredIn GX Works2, check the PLC parameter settings for the Ethernet port configuration. Confirm whether the built-in Ethernet port (or Ethernet module) is enabled and assigned an IP address.Affected if Ethernet port is enabled and configured with an IP address, making the device network-accessible on port 5007
-
Check network exposure of Port 5007From a workstation on the same network, run a port scan targeting the PLC IP address on port 5007 (e.g., nmap -p 5007 <PLC_IP> or telnet <PLC_IP> 5007). Check if the port responds or is accessible.Affected if Port 5007 is open and reachable from an untrusted network segment
-
Look for crash indicatorsCheck the CPU module for error indicators (RUN LED off, ERR LED flashing). In GX Works2, review the CPU error history and event log for recent entries indicating Ethernet stack failures or USB communication disruptions.Affected if Recent error logs show Ethernet stack crashes or USB communication failures with timestamps corresponding to potential malicious traffic
Your PLC is affected if it is a Q-series model from the affected list AND has firmware version 20081 or lower AND has Ethernet enabled, exposing port 5007 to the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate affected PLCs behind network segmentation/firewalls to limit exposure to Port 5007, and apply vendor firmware updates when released. Implement compensating controls such as intrusion detection to monitor for anomalous traffic on port 5007.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6535 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6535 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data