CVE-2019-6553
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic versions 4.10.00 and prior. An input validation issue in a .dll file of RSLinx Classic where the data in a Forward Open service request is passed to a fixed size buffer, allowing an attacker to exploit a stack-based buffer overflow condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic versions 4.10.00 and prior. The Forward Open service request data is copied to a fixed-size buffer in a .dll file without proper input validation, allowing remote attackers to overflow the buffer and potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.10.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RSLinx Classic is installedCheck the system for RSLinx Classic installation by reviewing installed programs or searching for RSLinx Classic executable filesAffected if RSLinx Classic is present on the system
-
Determine installed RSLinx Classic versionAccess the program's About or Help section, or check the executable properties to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The version number returned is 4.10.00 or lower
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the identified version against the affected range: any version less than or equal to 4.10.00 is vulnerableAffected if The installed version is 4.10.00 or any prior version (e.g., 4.00.00, 3.x, etc.)
-
Assess network exposure of Forward Open serviceDetermine if RSLinx Classic is listening on the network and accessible to remote systems, as the vulnerability is exploited via the Forward Open service requestAffected if RSLinx Classic is network-accessible and the Forward Open service is enabled
A system is affected if RSLinx Classic version 4.10.00 or lower is installed and is accessible over the network for remote exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch to obtain a version beyond 4.10.00. Until patched, network segment RSLinx Classic systems and restrict access to trusted PLC devices only.
RSLINX Classic version > 4.10.00 (contact Rockwell Automation for exact patched version)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of RSLinx Classic by checking the program properties or add/remove programs list
- 2. Navigate to the Rockwell Automation download portal or contact Rockwell Automation technical support to obtain the latest version of RSLinx Classic
- 3. Download the latest version of RSLinx Classic (ensure the version is newer than 4.10.00)
- 4. Back up any existing RSLinx project files and configurations
- 5. Uninstall the current version of RSLinx Classic through Windows Add/Remove Programs
- 6. Install the new version of RSLinx Classic using administrator privileges
- 7. Verify the installation was successful by checking the version number
- 8. Restore any backed up project files and configurations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6553 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data