CVE-2019-6677
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, and 12.1.0-12.1.5, under certain conditions when using custom TCP congestion control settings in a TCP profile, TMM stops processing traffic when processed by an iRule.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP where TMM (Traffic Management Module) stops processing traffic when custom TCP congestion control settings in a TCP profile are combined with iRule processing. This affects specific versions from 12.1.0 through 15.0.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.1.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.1>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the BIG-IP software versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or check System > Software Management > Software Images in the web UIAffected if The version falls within 12.1.0-12.1.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 14.0.0-14.0.1.0, 14.1.0-14.1.2.0, or 15.0.0-15.0.1.0
-
List all TCP profiles on the systemRun 'tmsh list /ltm profile tcp' to see all TCP profiles and their settingsAffected if Any TCP profile has 'congestion-control' set to a non-default value (not 'default' or 'cubic' or 'bic')
-
Identify iRules configured on the systemRun 'tmsh list /ltm rule' to list all iRules, then run 'tmsh list /ltm virtual' to see which virtual servers reference iRulesAffected if Any virtual server has one or more iRules assigned to it
-
Check for the combination of custom TCP congestion control and iRulesCross-reference the TCP profiles with custom congestion control against virtual servers that have iRules assignedAffected if A virtual server uses a TCP profile with custom congestion control AND has iRules applied to it
You are affected if you are running an affected version AND have a virtual server using a TCP profile with custom congestion control settings combined with iRule processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data13.1.3.214.0.1.114.1.2.1
Apply the appropriate F5 BIG-IP hotfix or upgrade to a patched version outside the affected version ranges. This is a service-affecting DoS vulnerability requiring prompt remediation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6677 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6677 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data