CVE-2019-6684
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn versions 15.0.0-15.0.1.1, 14.0.0-14.1.2.2, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, under certain conditions, a multi-bladed BIG-IP Virtual Clustered Multiprocessing (vCMP) may drop broadcast packets when they are rebroadcast to the vCMP guest secondary blades. An attacker can leverage the fragmented broadcast IP packets to perform any type of fragmentation-based attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn multi-bladed F5 BIG-IP vCMP environments, fragmented broadcast IP packets are incorrectly dropped when being rebroadcast to vCMP guest secondary blades. This allows attackers to send specially crafted fragmented broadcast packets to cause denial of service or potentially exploit fragment-based attack vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.0.0, < 13.1.3.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.3>= 15.0.0, < 15.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify vCMP is enabled on the BIG-IP systemRun 'tmsh show vcmp info' or check the vCMP status in the BIG-IP configuration via 'tmsh list sys vcmp'Affected if vCMP is enabled and running - if vCMP is disabled, the system is not affected by this vulnerability
-
Confirm the BIG-IP version falls within affected rangesRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check via the web UI under Device > Overview > System Information. Compare the version to: 11.5.2-11.6.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, 13.0.0-13.1.3.1, 14.0.0-14.1.2.2, or 15.0.0-15.1.0Affected if The installed version is within any of the listed affected ranges
-
Confirm multi-bladed vCMP deploymentRun 'tmsh show vcmp guest' to list all vCMP guests and their blade assignments. Check that secondary blades are hosting vCMP guestsAffected if The system uses multiple blades with vCMP guests on secondary blades - the vulnerability affects rebroadcast to secondary blade guests specifically
-
Verify broadcast traffic handling to vCMP guestsInspect network configuration for broadcast packet flow: check if there are any broadcast or multicast policies targeting vCMP guests. Review 'tmsh list net broadcast' and related network configurationAffected if Broadcast traffic is configured to be forwarded to vCMP guests in a multi-bladed environment
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable BIG-IP version, has vCMP enabled, uses multiple blades with vCMP guests on secondary blades, and handles broadcast traffic to those guests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data13.1.3.214.1.2.315.1.0
Upgrade F5 BIG-IP to versions beyond 15.0.1.1, 14.1.2.2, 13.1.3.1, 12.1.5, or 11.6.5.1 as appropriate. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, consider disabling vCMP if not required and implement network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6684 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data