CVE-2019-7219
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) exists in Zarafa Webapp 2.0.1.47791 and earlier. NOTE: this is a discontinued product. The issue was fixed in later Zarafa Webapp versions; however, some former Zarafa Webapp customers use the related Kopano product instead.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Zarafa Webapp 2.0.1.47791 and earlier allows attackers to inject malicious scripts via unsanitized input in HTTP parameters. This is a client-side attack requiring user interaction (e.g., clicking a crafted link).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.2.0-48204CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Zarafa Webapp installationCheck for Zarafa Webapp or Webaccess files on the server. Common paths include /usr/share/zarafa-webapp, /var/www/zarafa-webapp, or inspect web server configuration files (Apache/Nginx) for aliases pointing to Zarafa.Affected if Zarafa Webapp or Webaccess is installed and serving web content.
-
Determine installed versionLocate version information in the webapp installation directory. Check for version files, about pages, or the startup/debug output. The version may be displayed in the web interface login page source or in configuration files.Affected if Installed version is 7.2.0-48204 or earlier, or version 2.0.1.47791 or earlier (different version numbering schemes).
-
Verify web interface is accessibleConfirm the Zarafa web interface HTTP/HTTPS endpoints are reachable. Test access to common paths such as /webapp, /zarafawebapp, or the root URL if configured as the default vhost.Affected if The Zarafa Webapp web interface is exposed and accessible over the network.
-
Check for unsanitized HTTP parameter handlingReview web server logs and application logs for unusual query parameters in requests to Zarafa endpoints. Examine if user-supplied input in URL parameters is reflected in responses without encoding.Affected if HTTP parameters are being processed and reflected in responses without sanitization.
A user is affected if Zarafa Webapp or Webaccess is installed with a version at or below 7.2.0-48204 (or 2.0.1.47791) and the web interface is accessible, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince Zarafa Webapp is discontinued, upgrade to patched versions if available, or migrate to Kopano as recommended. Implement WAF rules to filter XSS payloads and validate/sanitize all user inputs server-side.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-7219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-7219 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data