CVE-2019-7896
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. An authenticated user with administrator privileges to layouts can execute arbitrary code through a combination of product import, crafted csv file and XML layout update.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRemote code execution vulnerability in Magento 2 allowing an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary code through product import by combining a crafted CSV file with XML layout update injection. The import process does not properly sanitize XML content in layout updates within the CSV, enabling code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.1.0, < 2.1.18>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.9>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Magento 2 versionRun command: php bin/magento --version or check composer.json for the magento/product-community-edition version numberAffected if Version is >= 2.1.0 and < 2.1.18, OR >= 2.2.0 and < 2.2.9, OR >= 2.3.0 and < 2.3.2
-
Verify administrator access existsCheck if any admin user accounts exist in the Magento database table admin_user or verify admin panel is accessibleAffected if At least one administrator account exists with access to the admin panel
-
Confirm product import functionality is enabledNavigate to System > Import in admin panel, or check configuration at Stores > Configuration > Catalog > Catalog > Product Import to verify import functionality is not disabledAffected if Product import is enabled and accessible to administrators
-
Review recent product import activity for suspicious CSV filesCheck import history in System > Import History, or review server access logs for POST requests to /admin/import/process/index/ containing 'layout_update' or '<block' strings in the CSV dataAffected if Any product imports have been performed using CSV files containing XML layout update content
Environment is affected if Magento 2 version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND an administrator account exists with access to the enabled product import feature.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.1.182.2.92.3.2
Upgrade Magento to version 2.1.18, 2.2.9, 2.3.2 or later. Limit administrator privileges to trusted users only and monitor product import activities for suspicious CSV content.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-7896 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-7896 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data