MagentoCMS

CVE-2019-7928

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-08-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.1.18 / 2.2.9 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. By abusing insufficient brute-forcing defenses in the token exchange protocol, an unauthenticated attacker could disrupt transactions between the Magento merchant and PayPal.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Magento 2's PayPal token exchange protocol due to insufficient brute-forcing defenses. An unauthenticated attacker can abuse this to disrupt transactions between Magento merchants and PayPal by overwhelming or manipulating the token exchange process.

MitigationUpgrade Magento to version 2.1.18, 2.2.9, or 2.3.2 or later. Additionally, implement rate limiting on PayPal integration endpoints and consider a web application firewall to mitigate automated attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MagentoCMS
Affected:>= 2.1.0, < 2.1.18>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.9>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine your Magento 2 installed version
    Run 'php bin/magento --version' from your Magento installation directory, or check the 'magento/version' file in your installation root, or view composer.json for the 'magento/product-community-edition' version entry
    Affected if The version falls within < 2.1.18, < 2.2.9, or < 2.3.2 for their respective major branches (2.1.x, 2.2.x, 2.3.x)
  2. Verify PayPal payment methods are configured
    Log into the Magento Admin Panel, navigate to Stores > Configuration > Payment Methods, and check if any PayPal payment methods (PayPal Express Checkout, PayPal Payments Pro, etc.) are enabled
    Affected if PayPal payment methods are enabled and the Magento version is in the affected range
  3. Inspect PayPal integration configuration files
    Check the file app/etc/config.php for the payment module status, specifically looking for 'payment/paypal/*' entries, or review the database table 'core_config_data' where path like 'payment/paypal%'
    Affected if PayPal configuration entries exist and are set to enabled (value = 1) while the Magento version is vulnerable
  4. Review access logs for token exchange abuse
    Examine web server access logs for repeated POST requests to PayPal token exchange endpoints (typically /paypal/express/authorize or similar PayPal-related endpoints) from single IP addresses in short time windows
    Affected if High volume of unauthenticated requests to PayPal endpoints is observed, especially from external IPs without corresponding successful transactions

You are affected if your Magento 2 installation version is below 2.1.18, 2.2.9, or 2.3.2 (depending on your major version branch) AND you have PayPal payment methods enabled in your Magento configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.1.18 / 2.2.9 / 2.3.2 or later
Fixed in 2.1.182.2.92.3.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Magento to version 2.1.18, 2.2.9, or 2.3.2 or later. Additionally, implement rate limiting on PayPal integration endpoints and consider a web application firewall to mitigate automated attacks.

Fix this in Magento Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-7928 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-7928 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data