Experience ManagerApplication · Adobe

CVE-2019-8084

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5, 6.4, 6.3 and 6.2 have a reflected cross site scripting vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 through 6.5. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through crafted URLs that are reflected back by the server without proper sanitization, potentially leading to session hijacking or sensitive information disclosure via cookie theft or credential harvesting.

MitigationApply the official Adobe security patch for CVE-2019-8084 when available, and implement output encoding and input validation on affected endpoints as an interim measure. Consider deploying a WAF rule to block XSS attack patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Experience ManagerApplication
Affected:= 6.2= 6.3= 6.4= 6.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Adobe Experience Manager version
    Access the AEM Web Console by navigating to /system/console/status-productinfo or check the 'About Adobe Experience Manager' section in the AEM welcome page. The version number will be displayed in the product information.
    Affected if The installed version matches 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, or 6.5 exactly.
  2. Confirm AEM is accessible and running
    Verify the AEM instance is reachable by attempting to access the login page or any public-facing AEM path. If the server responds normally, the application is active.
    Affected if The server responds and AEM is running, combined with being on an affected version from step 1.
  3. Test for reflected XSS in URL parameters
    Submit a benign test payload such as a simple script tag or alert command as a query parameter to various AEM endpoints (for example: ?test=<script>alert(1)</script>). Observe whether the payload is reflected back in the response without encoding or sanitization.
    Affected if The submitted payload appears verbatim in the HTML response without being escaped or encoded.
  4. Review HTTP response headers for security controls
    Capture the HTTP response headers from AEM pages using browser developer tools or a tool like curl. Look for presence or absence of X-XSS-Protection header and Content-Security-Policy headers that might mitigate XSS.
    Affected if No anti-XSS headers are present or they are configured permissively, making reflected XSS more likely to succeed.

If the installed AEM version is exactly 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, or 6.5 and URL parameters are reflected in responses without sanitization, the environment is affected by CVE-2019-8084.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the official Adobe security patch for CVE-2019-8084 when available, and implement output encoding and input validation on affected endpoints as an interim measure. Consider deploying a WAF rule to block XSS attack patterns.

Fix this in Experience Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-8084 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-8084 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data