CVE-2019-8234
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.4, 6.3 and 6.2 have a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4. Attackers can trick authenticated users into unknowingly submitting malicious requests, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.2= 6.3= 6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify AEM versionAccess the AEM System Information console at /system/console/configMgr or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folderAffected if The installed version is 6.2, 6.3, or 6.4 exactly
-
Check Adobe Granite CSRF Filter configurationNavigate to Adobe Granite CSRF Filter in the OSGi configuration console at /system/console/configMgr and verify if the filter is enabledAffected if The CSRF filter is disabled or not configured, and the AEM version falls within the affected range
-
Inspect SameSite cookie attributesReview the Day CQ Analytics cookie configuration or HttpSessionAttributes settings in the OSGi console at /system/console/configMgrAffected if SameSite attribute is not set to Strict or Lax on session cookies
-
Verify Referer header validationCheck the Apache Sling Referrer Filter configuration at /system/console/configMgr for allow.empty and allow.regexp settingsAffected if Referer validation is disabled and allows empty or spoofed Referer headers
You are affected if your AEM version is exactly 6.2, 6.3, or 6.4 AND anti-CSRF protections (CSRF filter, SameSite cookies, or Referer validation) are not properly configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and endpoints, validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and configure SameSite cookie attributes to prevent cross-site request forgery.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,288.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-8234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-8234 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data