Sentinel LdkApplication · Gemalto

CVE-2019-8282

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-06-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.92 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Gemalto Admin Control Center, all versions prior to 7.92, uses cleartext HTTP to communicate with www3.safenet-inc.com to obtain language packs. This allows attacker to do man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack and replace original language pack by malicious one.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Gemalto Admin Control Center (versions prior to 7.92) downloads language packs from www3.safenet-inc.com over unencrypted HTTP instead of HTTPS. An attacker positioned for man-in-the-middle (MITM) on the network path can intercept these requests and inject malicious code by replacing the legitimate language pack with a crafted malicious one.

MitigationUpgrade Gemalto Admin Control Center to version 7.92 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement network-level controls such as VPN or firewall rules to restrict outbound HTTP traffic and prevent MITM attacks on the affected communication path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sentinel LdkApplication
Affected:< 7.92

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Gemalto Sentinel LDK installation
    Check for the presence of Gemalto Sentinel LDK or Admin Control Center on the system. Look for installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Gemalto\Sentinel LDK or check Add/Remove Programs in Windows Control Panel for Sentinel LDK entries.
    Affected if Gemalto Sentinel LDK or Admin Control Center is installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Open the Admin Control Center and navigate to Help > About, or check the version information in the Windows Add/Remove Programs list. The version number is typically displayed in the format x.xx.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 7.92 (for example, 7.91, 7.90, or earlier)
  3. Verify language pack auto-download is enabled
    In Admin Control Center, navigate to the settings or preferences section and look for options related to language packs, updates, or automatic downloads. Check if the system is configured to automatically fetch language packs from external sources.
    Affected if Automatic language pack downloading is enabled and the system is configured to fetch from www3.safenet-inc.com
  4. Inspect network traffic configuration
    Use network monitoring tools or check the Admin Control Center configuration files for the download URL. Verify whether the language pack download path uses HTTP (port 80) rather than HTTPS (port 443).
    Affected if The language pack download URL is configured to use unencrypted HTTP instead of HTTPS

A user is affected if Gemalto Sentinel LDK with Admin Control Center version prior to 7.92 is installed and automatic language pack downloads from the unencrypted HTTP endpoint are enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.92 or later
Fixed in 7.92
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Gemalto Admin Control Center to version 7.92 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement network-level controls such as VPN or firewall rules to restrict outbound HTTP traffic and prevent MITM attacks on the affected communication path.

Fix this in Sentinel Ldk Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-8282 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-8282 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data