CVE-2019-8459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCheck Point Endpoint Security Client for Windows, with the VPN blade, before version E80.83, starts a process without using quotes in the path. This can cause loading of a previously placed executable with a name similar to the parts of the path, instead of the intended one.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCheck Point Endpoint Security Client for Windows with the VPN blade before version E80.83 starts processes without quoting path variables. This allows Windows to search for executables in each directory component of the path, enabling an attacker who has write access to any directory in the PATH to plant a malicious binary with a name matching a path component, which will be executed instead of the legitimate intended binary.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< r77.30< r77.30.03< r77.30.03= e80.83< e80.83< e80.83< e80.82CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Check Point Endpoint Security Client is installedOpen Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or check C:\Program Files\CheckPoint\Endpoint Security for installed client componentsAffected if Check Point Endpoint Security Client appears in installed programs
-
Identify the installed client versionRight-click the Check Point Endpoint Security tray icon, select 'Help' > 'About', or check the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\CheckPoint\Endpoint Security\Common\Install_VersionAffected if The version displayed is lower than E80.83 (for Endpoint Security Clients or Remote Access Clients) or lower than E80.82 (for Capsule Docs Standalone Client)
-
Confirm the VPN blade is enabledOpen Check Point Endpoint Security Client GUI, go to 'Blades' or 'Configuration' and verify if the VPN blade is activeAffected if The VPN blade is enabled and the client version is below E80.83
-
Identify the system PATH directoriesOpen Command Prompt and run 'echo %PATH%' to list all directories in the system PATH environment variableAffected if One or more directories in the PATH are writable by the current user or a low-privilege account
If Check Point Endpoint Security Client with the VPN blade is installed at a version below E80.83 AND any directory in the system PATH is writable by an untrusted user, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2019-8459.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Check Point Endpoint Security Client for Windows with VPN blade to version E80.83 or later. Additionally, restrict filesystem write access to directories in the system PATH to prevent binary planting.
E80.83 or later for clients; r77.30.03 or later for server components
- Identify the specific Check Point Endpoint Security product in use from the affected products list
- For Endpoint Security Clients and Remote Access Clients: Upgrade to version E80.83 or later
- For Capsule Docs Standalone Client: Upgrade to version E80.82 or later
- For Endpoint Security Server Package: Upgrade to version r77.30.03 or later
- For Smartconsole For Endpoint Security Server: Upgrade to version r77.30.03 or later
- For Jumbo Hotfix For Endpoint Security Server: Upgrade to version r77.30 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the unquoted path issue is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-8459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-8459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data