CVE-2019-8632
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSome analytics data was sent using HTTP rather than HTTPS. This was addressed by no longer sending this analytics data. This issue is fixed in Texture 5.11.10 for iOS, Texture 4.22.0.4 for Android. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to intercept analytics data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAnalytics data was transmitted in plaintext over unencrypted HTTP instead of HTTPS, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker on a privileged network to intercept sensitive analytics information. The vendor addressed this by completely removing the analytics data transmission rather than simply encrypting it.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.22.0.4< 5.11.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Apple Texture is installedCheck your device for the Texture app (icon shows a blue 'T' or 'Texture' label). On iOS, look in Settings > General > iPhone Storage > Texture. On Android, check Settings > Apps for 'Texture' or check the Google Play Store library.Affected if If Texture is installed, proceed to version check.
-
Determine installed version on iOSOpen Texture app, tap the profile/settings icon (usually top right), scroll to the bottom of the settings screen where the app version is displayed (format like x.x.x or x.xx.x). Alternatively, go to Settings > General > iPhone Storage > Texture to see the version.Affected if Versions below 5.11.10 are affected on iOS.
-
Determine installed version on AndroidOpen Google Play Store, search for Texture, tap on the app, and view the version number under the app name. Or go to Settings > Apps > Texture and view the version info.Affected if Versions below 4.22.0.4 are affected on Android.
-
Compare against vulnerable version rangesMatch your identified version: For iOS, check if version is less than 5.11.10. For Android, check if version is less than 4.22.0.4.Affected if If the installed version is below 5.11.10 (iOS) or below 4.22.0.4 (Android), the app transmits analytics data over unencrypted HTTP and is vulnerable.
You are affected if Apple Texture is installed and the version is below 5.11.10 on iOS or below 4.22.0.4 on Android, allowing network observers to intercept plaintext analytics data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.22.0.45.11.10
Update Texture to version 5.11.10 or higher on iOS, or version 4.22.0.4 or higher on Android to receive the fix that removes the vulnerable analytics transmission.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-8632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-8632 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data