CVE-2019-9228
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on AudioCodes Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR and 800C-MSBR devices with firmware versions F7.20A at least to 7.20A.252.062. The (1) management SSH and (2) management TELNET features allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection slot exhaustion) via 5 unauthenticated connection attempts, because the maximum number of unauthenticated clients that can be configured is 5. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this is a "design choice.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOn AudioCodes Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR and 800C-MSBR devices with firmware F7.20A through 7.20A.252.062, the management SSH and TELNET services allow only 5 configurable unauthenticated connection slots. Remote attackers can exhaust these slots by making 5 concurrent unauthenticated connection attempts, causing denial of service for legitimate administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= f7.20a, <= f7.20a.252.062>= f7.20a, <= f7.20a.252.062>= f7.20a, <= f7.20a.252.062>= f7.20a, <= f7.20a.252.062CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device management interface or check the device label to confirm it is one of: Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR, or 800C-MSBRAffected if The device is not one of these four models, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device management web interface or use the CLI command 'show system information' or 'sys get version' to retrieve the firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is >= F7.20A and <= 7.20A.252.062 (or displays as F7.20A.252.062 or earlier within this range)
-
Verify SSH management service is enabledAccess the device web interface under IP > SSH Settings or use CLI command 'ssh get' to check if the SSH service is enabled for managementAffected if SSH management service is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks
-
Verify TELNET management service is enabledAccess the device web interface under IP > Telnet Settings or use CLI command 'telnet get' to check if the TELNET service is enabled for managementAffected if TELNET management service is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks
-
Check the number of configured unauthenticated connection slotsAccess the device web interface under SSH or Telnet settings, or use CLI commands 'ssh get max-unauth' and 'telnet get max-unauth' to check the maximum concurrent unauthenticated connections settingAffected if The configured slot limit is 5 (the default) and the services are exposed to untrusted networks
The device is affected if it is a Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR, or 800C-MSBR running firmware between F7.20A and 7.20A.252.062, with SSH or TELNET management services enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement network-level controls such as firewall rules, ACLs, or IPSec VPNs to restrict management SSH/TELNET access to trusted IP addresses only, preventing unauthenticated connection attempts from untrusted networks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-9228 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-9228 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data