CVE-2019-9513
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSome HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCVE-2019-9513 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in HTTP/2 implementations where attackers exploit the stream priority mechanism by rapidly creating multiple request streams and continually shuffling their priorities. This causes excessive computational overhead as the server repeatedly rebalances the priority tree, leading to CPU exhaustion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.2.3>= 7.0.0, <= 7.1.6>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.3= 16.04= 18.04= 19.04= 9.0= 10.0= 30= 29= 1.0= 7.2.0= 7.3.0= 1.0= 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Apache Traffic Server versionRun 'trafficserver -v' or check package manager (dpkg -r rpm -q) for apache-traffic-serverAffected if Version is >= 6.0.0 and <= 6.2.3, OR >= 7.0.0 and <= 7.1.6, OR >= 8.0.0 and <= 8.0.3
-
Check if HTTP/2 is enabled in Apache Traffic ServerInspect configuration file records.config for 'proxy.config.http2.enabled' set to 1, or check any TLS configuration enabling ALPN h2 protocolAffected if HTTP/2 is enabled (value set to 1) and version matches affected range from step 1
-
Identify HTTP/2 server implementations on Linux systemsCheck installed HTTP/2-capable servers: 'dpkg -l' or 'rpm -qa' for nginx, apache2, httpd, or other HTTP/2 implementationsAffected if Vulnerable HTTP/2 server packages are installed on Ubuntu 16.04, 18.04, 19.04; Debian 9.0, 10.0; or Fedora 29, 30
-
Check Red Hat product versionsFor JBoss Core Services: 'rpm -q jboss-core-services'; for JBoss EAP: check 'rpm -q jboss-eap' or inspect /opt/jboss-eap-*/bin/standalone.sh version; for Quay: 'docker images quay.io/quay/quay' or 'rpm -q quay'Affected if JBoss Core Services = 1.0, JBoss EAP = 7.2.0 or 7.3.0, Quay = 3.0.0, or OpenShift Service Mesh = 1.0 is installed with HTTP/2 exposed
Your environment is affected if any of the identified products match the specific version ranges AND HTTP/2 protocol is enabled and exposed to untrusted network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate affected HTTP/2 implementations (web servers, proxies, load balancers) to versions that address this vulnerability, or temporarily disable HTTP/2 if patches are unavailable.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-9513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- github.com
- kb.cert.org
- kc.mcafee.com
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- security.netapp.com
- security.netapp.com
- support.f5.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.synology.com
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- support.f5.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-9513 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data