CVE-2019-9621
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZimbra Collaboration Suite before 8.6 patch 13, 8.7.x before 8.7.11 patch 10, and 8.8.x before 8.8.10 patch 7 or 8.8.x before 8.8.11 patch 3 allows SSRF via the ProxyServlet component.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceZimbra Collaboration Suite contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the ProxyServlet component. The ProxyServlet fails to properly validate or restrict the URLs it forwards requests to, allowing an attacker to make the Zimbra server request arbitrary URLs. This can be exploited to access internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or internal network resources that should not be exposed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.6.0>= 8.7.0, < 8.7.11>= 8.8.0, < 8.8.9= 8.6.0= 8.7.11= 8.8.9= 8.8.10= 8.8.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Zimbra versionRun '/opt/zimbra/bin/zmcontrol -v' or check '/opt/zimbra/.install_history' for version information. On Red Hat/CentOS also check 'rpm -qa | grep zimbra'Affected if Version is < 8.6.0, or between 8.7.0-8.7.11 inclusive, or between 8.8.0-8.8.11 inclusive, or equals 8.6.0, 8.7.11, 8.8.9, 8.8.10, or 8.8.11
-
Confirm ProxyServlet endpoint is exposedCheck if the web server exposes the ProxyServlet path. This is typically at '/service/proxy' or '/zimbraAdmin/proxy' relative to the Zimbra web root. Inspect the application server configuration files in /opt/zimbra/jetty*/webapps/ for servlet mappingsAffected if ProxyServlet is accessible without additional authentication restrictions beyond normal Zimbra access controls
-
Verify network accessibility of ProxyServletFrom an external or less-trusted network perspective, attempt to reach the ProxyServlet endpoint (e.g., curl http://<server>/service/proxy) or review firewall/WAF rules that permit or block access to this endpointAffected if The ProxyServlet endpoint can be reached from network segments where untrusted users can initiate requests
The environment is affected if Zimbra version is any release before 8.8.12 (including all 8.6.x, 8.7.x through 8.7.11, and 8.8.x through 8.8.11) AND the ProxyServlet component is accessible to the attacker via HTTP/HTTPS
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.08.7.118.8.9
Apply the appropriate Zimbra patch for the installed version: patch 13 for 8.6.x, patch 10 for 8.7.11, patch 7 for 8.8.10, or patch 3 for 8.8.11. As a compensating control, restrict network access to the ProxyServlet endpoint via firewall rules or WAF policies.
8.8.10 patch 7 or later (or 8.8.11 patch 3 or later)
- 1. Back up the current Zimbra Collaboration Suite installation and database
- 2. Identify the current ZCS version by running: zmcontrol -v
- 3. For ZCS 8.6.x: Upgrade to 8.6.0 patch 13 or later
- 4. For ZCS 8.7.x: Upgrade to 8.7.11 patch 10 or later
- 5. For ZCS 8.8.x: Upgrade to 8.8.10 patch 7 or later, OR 8.8.11 patch 3 or later
- 6. Download the appropriate patched version from the official Zimbra downloads portal (https://www.zimbra.com/download/)
- 7. Run the installation script as the root user: ./install.sh
- 8. After installation, verify the version: zmcontrol -v
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-9621 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-9621 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data