PuttyApplication

CVE-2019-9896

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-03-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.71 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In PuTTY versions before 0.71 on Windows, local attackers could hijack the application by putting a malicious help file in the same directory as the executable.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A binary planting vulnerability in PuTTY before version 0.71 on Windows allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing a malicious help file (.chm or .hlp) in the same directory as the PuTTY executable. When PuTTY runs, it loads the malicious help file instead of the legitimate one from its installation directory.

MitigationUpdate PuTTY to version 0.71 or later. Additionally, ensure PuTTY is run from a directory that is not writable by untrusted users (avoid running from user-downloads or shared folders).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PuttyApplication
Affected:< 0.71
Backports SleApplication
Affected:= 15.0
LeapOperating system
Affected:= 15.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate PuTTY executable and identify its version
    Find putty.exe on the system (common paths: C:\Program Files\PuTTY\putty.exe, C:\Program Files (x86)\PuTTY\putty.exe). Right-click the executable, select Properties, and check the Version tab or File version field. Alternatively, run 'putty.exe -V' or 'putty.exe --version' from command prompt.
    Affected if The reported version is less than 0.71 (for example, 0.70, 0.68, or earlier)
  2. Determine the directory from which PuTTY is launched
    Observe the current working directory when launching PuTTY. If launching via shortcut, right-click the shortcut and check the 'Start in' field. Identify if this directory is in user-downloads, shared network folders, or other locations writable by untrusted users.
    Affected if PuTTY is launched from or runs in a directory that is writable by untrusted users (e.g., Downloads folder, shared network drive, desktop)
  3. Check for unexpected help files in the PuTTY launch directory
    Inspect the directory from which PuTTY is run. Look for files with .chm or .hlp extensions (e.g., putty.chm, putty.hlp, PuTTY_help.chm) that are not part of the official PuTTY installation.
    Affected if A .chm or .hlp file exists in the same directory as the PuTTY executable and was not placed there by the official installer
  4. Compare the help file path loaded by PuTTY
    Run PuTTY with Process Monitor (ProcMon) from Sysinternals to trace file accesses. Filter for PuTTY.exe accessing .chm or .hlp files. Verify whether it loads the file from its installation directory (e.g., C:\Program Files\PuTTY\putty.chm) or from the current working directory.
    Affected if PuTTY loads a help file from the current working directory rather than from its installation directory

A system is affected if PuTTY version is below 0.71 AND PuTTY is run from or can have its working directory controlled by an untrusted user who can place a malicious .chm or .hlp file.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.71 or later
Fixed in 0.71
Interim mitigation

Update PuTTY to version 0.71 or later. Additionally, ensure PuTTY is run from a directory that is not writable by untrusted users (avoid running from user-downloads or shared folders).

Fix this in Putty Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-9896 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-9896 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data