CVE-2020-0073
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn rw_t2t_handle_tlv_detect_rsp of rw_t2t_ndef.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution over NFC with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-147309942
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA bounds check vulnerability exists in the NFC Type 2 Tag NDEF handling function rw_t2t_handle_tlv_detect_rsp in rw_t2t_ndef.cc. The function fails to validate buffer boundaries when processing TLV (Tag-Length-Value) responses from NFC tags, allowing an attacker to trigger an out-of-bounds write. This enables remote code execution with NFC service privileges since NFC runs as a privileged system service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 8.1= 9.0= 10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android version is affectedGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version. The device is potentially affected if running Android 8.0, 8.1, 9.0, or 10.0.Affected if Android version is 8.0, 8.1, 9.0, or 10.0 and the security patch is not applied
-
Confirm NFC is enabledGo to Settings > Network & Internet > NFC (or Settings > Connections > NFC on Samsung). Check if NFC toggle is turned on.Affected if NFC is enabled - this creates the attack surface for the vulnerability
-
Check security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Security patch level. Compare the date shown against the Android security bulletin for the month the CVE was patched (refer to the Android Security Bulletin for CVE-2020-0073).Affected if The security patch level is older than the patch date for CVE-2020-0073, meaning the fix has not been applied
-
Identify NFC stack moduleThis vulnerability exists in the NFC Type 2 Tag NDEF handling component (rw_t2t_handle_tlv_detect_rsp function in the NFC service). The attack requires processing a malicious NFC tag.Affected if The device uses the vulnerable NFC stack and processes NFC Type 2 tags without the boundary check validation fix
A device is affected if it runs Android 8.0-10.0, has NFC enabled, and lacks the CVE-2020-0073 security patch - the vulnerability requires NFC to be active and a crafted NFC tag to be scanned.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch for CVE-2020-0073 from the respective Android security bulletin. As this is a platform-level vulnerability in the NFC stack, no configuration workaround exists; the system must be updated to a patched Android version.
March 2020 Android Security Patch Level or later (contact your device manufacturer or carrier for update availability)
- Check your device's current Security Patch Level by going to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- If the Security Patch Level is earlier than March 2020, check for a system update by going to Settings > System > System Update > Check for Update
- Install any available system updates. The fix for CVE-2020-0073 is included in the March 2020 Android Security Bulletin (or later)
- After updating, verify the Security Patch Level now shows March 2020 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-0073 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-0073 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data