CVE-2020-0528
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper buffer restrictions in BIOS firmware for 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor families may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege and/or denial of service via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper buffer restrictions in BIOS firmware for 7th-10th Generation Intel Core processors allow an authenticated local user to potentially escalate privileges or cause denial of service. This is a firmware-level buffer overflow or similar memory corruption issue requiring local access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the processor modelRun 'wmic cpu get name' (Windows) or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' (Linux) to determine the exact Intel Core processor installedAffected if The processor is one of: i5-7600k, i5-7600t, i5-7600, i5-7500, i5-7500t, i5-7442eq, i5-7440hq, i5-7440eq
-
Confirm the processor generationVerify the processor is 7th Generation (Kaby Lake architecture) by the model number prefixAffected if The processor is a 7th Generation Intel Core i5 from the affected list
-
Check BIOS/firmware versionRun 'wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion' (Windows) or 'dmidecode -s bios-version' (Linux) or access BIOS setup during boot to view the firmware versionAffected if Any BIOS/firmware version is present on an affected processor (all versions are vulnerable)
System is affected if it contains any of the listed Intel Core i5 7th Generation processor models running any BIOS version, as the vulnerability exists across all firmware versions for these specific CPUs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Intel or OEM-provided BIOS/firmware updates for affected 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th Generation Intel Core systems. Since this requires local access, restrict physical and local administrative access to vulnerable systems.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-0528 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-0528 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data