RecursorApplication · Powerdns

CVE-2020-10030

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 up to and including 4.3.0. It allows an attacker (with enough privileges to change the system's hostname) to cause disclosure of uninitialized memory content via a stack-based out-of-bounds read. It only occurs on systems where gethostname() does not have '\0' termination of the returned string if the hostname is larger than the supplied buffer. (Linux systems are not affected because the buffer is always large enough. OpenBSD systems are not affected because the returned hostname always has '\0' termination.) Under some conditions, this issue can lead to the writing of one '\0' byte out-of-bounds on the stack, causing a denial of service or possibly arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The PowerDNS Recursor versions 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 contain a stack-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the handling of gethostname() return values. When the system hostname exceeds the supplied buffer size, the returned string may not be null-terminated on certain platforms (excluding Linux and OpenBSD), leading to disclosure of uninitialized stack memory. Under certain conditions, this can also result in writing a null byte out-of-bounds, potentially causing denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade PowerDNS Recursor to version 4.3.1 or later to patch this vulnerability. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should monitor for suspicious hostname changes and restrict privileged access to systems that can modify the hostname.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RecursorApplication
Affected:>= 4.1.0, <= 4.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if PowerDNS Recursor is installed
    Run 'pdns_recursor --version' or 'rec_control version' to confirm the product is present
    Affected if No output or command not found indicates the product is not installed
  2. Identify the installed version
    Run 'pdns_recursor --version' and parse the version number from the output
    Affected if Version is 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.1.5, 4.1.6, 4.1.7, 4.1.8, 4.1.9, 4.1.10, 4.1.11, 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.3.0 (any version >= 4.1.0 and <= 4.3.0)
  3. Check the operating system platform
    Run 'uname -s' or check /etc/os-release to identify the OS
    Affected if Platform is NOT Linux or NOT OpenBSD (the vulnerability specifically does NOT affect Linux and OpenBSD)
  4. Check the system hostname length
    Run 'hostname' to view the current hostname, then check its character count
    Affected if Hostname length exceeds the buffer size used internally by gethostname() calls (typically 256 bytes), which is unlikely but the condition exists when hostname is very long

The environment is affected if PowerDNS Recursor version 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 is installed and the platform is not Linux or OpenBSD.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade PowerDNS Recursor to version 4.3.1 or later to patch this vulnerability. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should monitor for suspicious hostname changes and restrict privileged access to systems that can modify the hostname.

Fix this in Recursor Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10030 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data