CVE-2020-10094
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lexmark CS31x before LW74.VYL.P273; CS41x before LW74.VY2.P273; CS51x before LW74.VY4.P273; CX310 before LW74.GM2.P273; CX410 & XC2130 before LW74.GM4.P273; CX510 & XC2132 before LW74.GM7.P273; MS310, MS312, MS317 before LW74.PRL.P273; MS410, M1140 before LW74.PRL.P273; MS315, MS415, MS417 before LW74.TL2.P273; MS51x, MS610dn, MS617 before LW74.PR2.P273; M1145, M3150dn before LW74.PR2.P273; MS610de, M3150 before LW74.PR4.P273; MS71x,M5163dn before LW74.DN2.P273; MS810, MS811, MS812, MS817, MS818 before LW74.DN2.P273; MS810de, M5155, M5163 before LW74.DN4.P273; MS812de, M5170 before LW74.DN7.P273; MS91x before LW74.SA.P273; MX31x, XM1135 before LW74.SB2.P273; MX410, MX510 & MX511 before LW74.SB4.P273; XM1140, XM1145 before LW74.SB4.P273; MX610 & MX611 before LW74.SB7.P273; XM3150 before LW74.SB7.P273; MX71x, MX81x before LW74.TU.P273; XM51xx & XM71xx before LW74.TU.P273; MX91x & XM91x before LW74.MG.P273; MX6500e before LW74.JD.P273; C746 before LHS60.CM2.P738; C748, CS748 before LHS60.CM4.P738; C792, CS796 before LHS60.HC.P738; C925 before LHS60.HV.P738; C950 before LHS60.TP.P738; X548 & XS548 before LHS60.VK.P738; X74x & XS748 before LHS60.NY.P738; X792 & XS79x before LHS60.MR.P738; X925 & XS925 before LHS60.HK.P738; X95x & XS95x before LHS60.TQ.P738; 6500e before LHS60.JR.P738;C734 LR.SK.P824 and earlier; C736 LR.SKE.P824 and earlier; E46x LR.LBH.P824 and earlier; T65x LR.JP.P824 and earlier; X46x LR.BS.P824 and earlier; X65x LR.MN.P824 and earlier; X73x LR.FL.P824 and earlier; W850 LP.JB.P823 and earlier; and X86x LP.SP.P823 and earlier.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in multiple Lexmark printer models. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable input fields within the printer web interface. When authenticated users access affected pages, the injected script executes, potentially stealing session cookies or performing actions on behalf of the user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= lw74.vyl.p272<= lw74.vy2.p272<= lw74.vy4.p272<= lw74.gm2.p272<= lw74.gm4.p272<= lw74.gm4.p272<= lw74.gm7.p272<= lw74.gm7.p272CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Lexmark printer modelAccess the printer web interface and navigate to the 'About' or 'Device Status' page, or print a configuration/settings page from the printer control panel to locate the model nameAffected if The model is one of: Cs31x, Cs41x, Cs51x, Cx310, Cx410, Xc2130, Cx510, or Xc2132
-
Locate the firmware versionIn the printer web interface, go to 'Settings' > 'Device' > 'About' or 'Firmware', or check the printed configuration page for the firmware version stringAffected if Unable to retrieve firmware version indicates limited visibility but does not confirm or rule out vulnerability
-
Compare firmware version against affected thresholdsMatch the installed firmware version to the affected ranges: Cs31x <= lw74.vyl.p272, Cs41x <= lw74.vy2.p272, Cs51x <= lw74.vy4.p272, Cx310 <= lw74.gm2.p272, Cx410/Xc2130 <= lw74.gm4.p272, Cx510/Xc2132 <= lw74.gm7.p272Affected if The installed firmware version is at or below the specified version for that model series
-
Verify web interface is accessibleAttempt to reach the printer IP address over HTTP/HTTPS in a web browser. If the login page loads, the web interface is enabledAffected if Web interface is accessible and the firmware version meets the affected threshold criteria
A user is affected if their Lexmark printer model matches one of the eight listed models AND the installed firmware version is at or below the specific threshold for that model, with the printer web interface accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Lexmark printer firmware to the patched versions specified in the advisory (LW74.xxxx.P273 or LHS60.xxxx.P738 or LR.xxxx.P824 or LP.xxxx.P823 depending on model series).
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10094 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data