SearchbloxApplication

CVE-2020-10132

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SearchBlox before Version 9.1 is vulnerable to cross-origin resource sharing misconfiguration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SearchBlox before version 9.1 contains a cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) misconfiguration that allows unauthorized cross-origin requests. This could permit malicious websites to make requests to the SearchBlox application on behalf of authenticated users, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling unauthorized actions.

MitigationUpgrade SearchBlox to version 9.1 or later. Additionally, review and properly configure CORS headers to restrict allowed origins to trusted domains only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SearchbloxApplication
Affected:< 9.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm SearchBlox is installed
    Access the SearchBlox application URL or check for SearchBlox processes/services running on the server. Look for the SearchBlox admin interface at the typical path (such as /searchblox/ or /admin/).
    Affected if SearchBlox is found to be running on the system
  2. Identify the installed version
    Navigate to the SearchBlox admin interface and locate the version information typically displayed on the dashboard or about page. Alternatively, check any version file in the installation directory or examine the application banner in HTTP responses.
    Affected if The version displayed is below 9.1 (any version 9.0, 8.x, or earlier)
  3. Verify CORS is enabled
    Send a cross-origin HTTP request to the SearchBlox API or search endpoint with an Origin header set to an arbitrary domain (such as http://malicious-site.com). Inspect the response headers for Access-Control-Allow-Origin and Access-Control-Allow-Credentials headers.
    Affected if The response includes Access-Control-Allow-Origin header with a value that is not restricted to specific trusted domains
  4. Inspect allowed origins configuration
    Examine the SearchBlox configuration files or admin settings related to CORS. Look for settings that control allowed cross-origin domains, typically found in the security or CORS configuration section of the admin panel or in configuration XML/JSON files.
    Affected if The CORS configuration allows wildcard (*) or permits origins that are not explicitly trusted and verified in your environment

If SearchBlox version is below 9.1 AND the CORS configuration permits unrestricted or untrusted origins, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2020-10132.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.1 or later
Fixed in 9.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade SearchBlox to version 9.1 or later. Additionally, review and properly configure CORS headers to restrict allowed origins to trusted domains only.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

SearchBlox 9.1

  1. 1. Back up your current SearchBlox installation and configuration.
  2. 2. Download SearchBlox version 9.1 or later from the official vendor source.
  3. 3. Install the new version following the vendor's upgrade documentation.
  4. 4. Verify that the CORS configuration is properly set and the vulnerability is resolved.
  5. 5. Test the application to ensure normal functionality after the upgrade.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Searchblox Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10132 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10132 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data