PsypraxApplication

CVE-2020-10553

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-02-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2.2 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Psyprax before 3.2.2. The file %PROGRAMDATA%\Psyprax32\PPScreen.ini contains a hash for the lockscreen (aka screensaver) of the application. If that entry is removed, the lockscreen is no longer displayed and the app is no longer locked. All local users are able to modify that file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

In Psyprax before 3.2.2, the file %PROGRAMDATA%\Psyprax32\PPScreen.ini stores a hash for the application lockscreen/screensaver. The vulnerability stems from overly permissive file access controls that allow all local users to modify this configuration file. By removing the hash entry from PPScreen.ini, an attacker can disable the lockscreen and bypass the application's access control mechanism.

MitigationRestrict file permissions on PPScreen.ini to prevent modification by non-privileged users, and update to Psyprax 3.2.2 or later which addresses this insecure configuration storage issue.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PsypraxApplication
Affected:< 3.2.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Psyprax version
    Locate the Psyprax installation and determine the installed version number. Common locations include the program's directory under Program Files or Program Files (x86), or check the application's About/Version information within the program itself.
    Affected if Version is less than 3.2.2
  2. Locate PPScreen.ini configuration file
    Navigate to %PROGRAMDATA%\Psyprax32\PPScreen.ini on the system. This file stores the lockscreen/screensaver hash configuration.
    Affected if File exists at this location and version is below 3.2.2
  3. Verify file permissions on PPScreen.ini
    Right-click PPScreen.ini, go to Properties > Security tab, and examine the permissions. Check which users and groups have Write or Full Control permissions on this file.
    Affected if Non-privileged local users (such as Users group or Everyone) have Write or Full Control permissions, allowing them to modify the file
  4. Confirm hash entry exists in PPScreen.ini
    Open PPScreen.ini in a text editor and look for a hash-related entry (such as Password, Hash, ScreenLock, or similar field) that stores the lockscreen authentication credential.
    Affected if A hash value is present in the configuration file, indicating the lockscreen protection mechanism is in use
  5. Test write access as non-privileged user
    If possible, attempt to modify or delete PPScreen.ini using a standard user account without administrative privileges to confirm the vulnerability is exploitable.
    Affected if A standard user can successfully modify or delete the PPScreen.ini file

Environment is affected if Psyprax version is below 3.2.2 AND PPScreen.ini grants non-privileged users the ability to modify this configuration file, allowing them to remove the lockscreen hash and bypass access controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2.2 or later
Fixed in 3.2.2
Interim mitigation

Restrict file permissions on PPScreen.ini to prevent modification by non-privileged users, and update to Psyprax 3.2.2 or later which addresses this insecure configuration storage issue.

Fix this in Psyprax Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10553 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data