CVE-2020-10581
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple session validity check issues in several administration functionalities of Invigo Automatic Device Management (ADM) through 5.0 allow remote attackers to read potentially sensitive data hosted by the application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple administration functionalities in Invigo Automatic Device Management (ADM) through version 5.0 fail to properly validate session validity, allowing remote attackers to bypass authentication checks and access sensitive data hosted by the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Invigo ADM installationLocate the Invigo Automatic Device Management application in your environment and identify its installation directory or service nameAffected if The product is Invigo Automatic Device Management and the version is 5.0 or lower
-
Determine installed versionCheck the application version displayed in the software UI, about page, or installation metadataAffected if The version is 5.0 or any version lower than 5.0
-
Verify admin interface accessibilityAccess the web-based administration portal or administrative API endpoints for Invigo ADM using the standard admin URL or portAffected if The admin interface is reachable and responds to requests
-
Test session validation on admin endpointsSend unauthenticated or invalid session requests to sensitive admin endpoints (such as user management, device configuration, or reporting functions) and observe whether the application returns authorized data or error messages indicating authentication is enforcedAffected if The application returns sensitive data or allows access without a valid session token, indicating session validation is not properly enforced
-
Review session handling configurationExamine application configuration files or settings related to session management, authentication timeout, and token validationAffected if Session validation settings are missing, disabled, or set to allow bypass on administrative functions
You are affected if Invigo Automatic Device Management version 5.0 or lower is installed and the admin interface permits access to sensitive functions without proper session validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview and implement proper session validation checks across all administrative endpoints, ensure session tokens are validated on each request, and consider implementing additional authorization controls for sensitive data access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10581 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10581 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data