CVE-2020-10663
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe JSON gem through 2.2.0 for Ruby, as used in Ruby 2.4 through 2.4.9, 2.5 through 2.5.7, and 2.6 through 2.6.5, has an Unsafe Object Creation Vulnerability. This is quite similar to CVE-2013-0269, but does not rely on poor garbage-collection behavior within Ruby. Specifically, use of JSON parsing methods can lead to creation of a malicious object within the interpreter, with adverse effects that are application-dependent.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JSON gem through version 2.2.0 for Ruby contains an Unsafe Object Creation Vulnerability. Attackers can craft malicious JSON input that causes the parser to instantiate arbitrary Ruby objects within the interpreter, similar to CVE-2013-0269 but without relying on Ruby's garbage collection behavior. The impact is application-dependent based on what objects can be instantiated.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.2.0= 30= 31= 8.0= 10.0= 15.1= 11.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed JSON gem versionRun `gem list json` or `ruby -e "require 'json'; puts JSON::VERSION"` to see the installed versionAffected if Version is 2.2.0 or lower
-
Identify JSON gem usage in applicationSearch codebase for `require 'json'` and JSON.parse calls, particularly looking for `create_additions: true` or default behaviorAffected if JSON parsing is used with create_additions enabled (default in some configurations)
-
Check Gemfile or gemspec for JSON gem dependencyInspect Gemfile, Gemfile.lock, or *.gemspec files for json gem version specificationAffected if Json gem is pinned to version <= 2.2.0 or no version constraint allowing update
-
Verify Ruby process loads JSON gemRun `ruby -e "require 'json'; p JSON::Parser::Integer::PARSER"` to check if custom parser with unsafe object creation is activeAffected if Custom parser objects can be instantiated through JSON parsing
You are affected if the JSON gem version is 2.2.0 or lower and your application parses untrusted JSON input with create_additions enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the JSON gem to version 2.2.1 or later. Review application code that uses JSON parsing to ensure no insecure object instantiation patterns exist.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.ruby-lang.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- seclists.org
- lists.debian.org
- security.netapp.com
- support.apple.com
- www.debian.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10663 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data