TYPO3CMS

CVE-2020-11069

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In TYPO3 CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.16 and 10.0.0 through 10.4.1, it has been discovered that the backend user interface and install tool are vulnerable to a same-site request forgery. A backend user can be tricked into interacting with a malicious resource an attacker previously managed to upload to the web server. Scripts are then executed with the privileges of the victims' user session. In a worst-case scenario, new admin users can be created which can directly be used by an attacker. The vulnerability is basically a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) triggered by a cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) - but happens on the same target host - thus, it's actually a same-site request forgery. Malicious payload such as HTML containing JavaScript might be provided by either an authenticated backend user or by a non-authenticated user using a third party extension, e.g. file upload in a contact form with knowing the target location. To be successful, the attacked victim requires an active and valid backend or install tool user session at the time of the attack. This has been fixed in 9.5.17 and 10.4.2. The deployment of additional mitigation techniques is suggested as described below. - Sudo Mode Extension This TYPO3 extension intercepts modifications to security relevant database tables, e.g. those storing user accounts or storages of the file abstraction layer. Modifications need to confirmed again by the acting user providing their password again. This technique is known as sudo mode. This way, unintended actions happening in the background can be mitigated. - https://github.com/FriendsOfTYPO3/sudo-mode - https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/sudo_mode - Content Security Policy Content Security Policies tell (modern) browsers how resources served a particular site are handled. It is also possible to disallow script executions for specific locations. In a TYPO3 context, it is suggested to disallow direct script execution at least for locations /fileadmin/ and /uploads/.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

TYPO3 CMS versions 9.0.0-9.5.16 and 10.0.0-10.4.1 contain a same-site request forgery vulnerability where malicious HTML/JavaScript uploaded to the server (by authenticated or unauthenticated users via extensions) can trick authenticated backend users into executing privileged actions, potentially creating new admin accounts.

MitigationUpgrade to TYPO3 9.5.17 or 10.4.2 or later; additionally deploy the Sudo Mode extension to require password confirmation for sensitive actions and implement Content Security Policy headers to disallow script execution in /fileadmin/ and /uploads/ directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TYPO3CMS
Affected:>= 9.0.0, <= 9.5.16>= 10.0.0, <= 10.4.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed TYPO3 version
    Log into the TYPO3 backend and navigate to the 'About' module (or check the composer.json file in the web root for the 'typo3/cms' version). Compare the version number against the affected ranges: 9.0.0-9.5.16 or 10.0.0-10.4.1.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 9.0.0-9.5.16 or 10.0.0-10.4.1.
  2. Identify enabled file upload extensions
    In the TYPO3 backend, go to 'Extension Manager' and review installed extensions. Look for extensions that provide file upload functionality (such as filelist, extbase, or third-party upload extensions). Check the file admin configuration in the 'File' module to see which user groups can upload files.
    Affected if Extensions allowing file uploads to /fileadmin/ or /uploads/ directories are enabled and accessible to unauthenticated or low-privileged users.
  3. Inspect upload directories for suspicious files
    Use a file manager or command line to list all files in /fileadmin/ and /uploads/ directories. Search for files with extensions such as .html, .htm, .js, or .php that were recently created or modified.
    Affected if Any HTML files containing script tags, or JavaScript files, exist in upload directories.
  4. Review backend user accounts for unauthorized admin creation
    In the TYPO3 backend, navigate to 'User Management' (or 'Admin Tools > Users') and review all backend user accounts. Check for new or unexpected accounts with administrator privileges.
    Affected if There are backend admin accounts that were not created by known administrators.
  5. Check access logs for privileged action requests
    Review web server access logs (Apache/nginx) for POST requests toTYPO3 backend endpoints such as /typo3/record/commit, /typo3/ajax/ or user creation routes, especially those originating from the same site (referer matching the site domain) that may indicate cross-site request forgery.
    Affected if Logs show privileged actions (user creation, permission changes) performed shortly after file upload activity.

A system is affected if it runs TYPO3 version 9.0.0-9.5.16 or 10.0.0-10.4.1 and allows file uploads to accessible directories where malicious HTML/JavaScript could be stored and executed in a victim's browser.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.4.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to TYPO3 9.5.17 or 10.4.2 or later; additionally deploy the Sudo Mode extension to require password confirmation for sensitive actions and implement Content Security Policy headers to disallow script execution in /fileadmin/ and /uploads/ directories.

Fix this in TYPO3 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-11069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-11069 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data