CVE-2020-11155
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'Buffer overflow while processing PDU packet in bluetooth due to lack of check of buffer length before copying into it.' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8053, QCA6390, QCN7605, QCN7606, SA415M, SA515M, SA6155P, SA8155P, SC8180X, SDX55
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the Bluetooth stack's PDU packet processing code. The vulnerability exists because the code copies data into a fixed-size buffer without first validating the input buffer length, allowing an attacker to overflow the buffer with a specially crafted PDU packet and potentially achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device hardware specifications, system information, or kernel modules to determine if the device uses one of the following chipsets: Apq8009, Apq8053, Qca6390, Qcn7605, Qcn7606, Sa415m, Sa515m, or Sa6155p. This can typically be found via 'lspci', 'lsusb', 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', or the device's technical documentation.Affected if The device does not contain one of the listed chipset models, it is not affected by this specific CVE.
-
Determine the firmware versionRetrieve the Bluetooth firmware version by examining the Bluetooth controller firmware files, using commands such as 'hciconfig -a', 'btmgmt info', or checking /lib/firmware/qca/ for Qualcomm-specific firmware files. Compare the firmware version against the affected product list.Affected if All firmware versions for the listed chipsets are affected (the list states 'all versions' for each chipset).
-
Verify Bluetooth is enabledCheck if the Bluetooth subsystem is active by running 'systemctl status bluetooth', 'rfkill list', or 'hciconfig'. The vulnerability resides in the Bluetooth stack PDU processing, so Bluetooth must be powered on for the flaw to be exploitable.Affected if Bluetooth is disabled or the Bluetooth controller is not powered, the vulnerability cannot be triggered.
-
Inspect Bluetooth packet processing logsReview system logs (journalctl, dmesg, /var/log/syslog) for any Bluetooth-related crashes, buffer overflow errors, or unexpected PDU handling failures that may indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Unexpected crashes or errors related to Bluetooth PDU processing are observed, this may indicate the vulnerability is present or has been exploited.
A device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8053, Qca6390, Qcn7605, Qcn7606, Sa415m, Sa515m, Sa6155p), runs the corresponding Bluetooth firmware, and has Bluetooth enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware updates for affected Snapdragon chipsets. Organizations should identify all devices using listed chipsets and coordinate with original equipment manufacturers for patch deployment.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-11155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-11155 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data