CVE-2020-11293
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut of bound read can happen in Widevine TA while copying data to buffer from user data due to lack of check of buffer length received in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in Widevine Trusted Application across multiple Snapdragon platforms. The vulnerability occurs due to missing buffer length validation when copying data from user input to an internal buffer, allowing unauthorized memory reads beyond buffer boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device chipset modelQuery the system for the SoC/processor identifier using commands such as 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', 'dmesg', or device information APIs (e.g., android.os.Build.HARDWARE on Android). Compare the chipset name against the list: Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Apq8064au, Apq8096au, Aqt1000, Ar8031, Ar8035.Affected if The chipset matches any of the listed affected Qualcomm model numbers.
-
Confirm Widevine Trusted Application is presentCheck for the presence of the Widevine TA component on the device. On Android this may involve inspecting /vendor/etc/, /system/etc/, or checking DRM service status via 'dumpsys media.drm' or 'getprop ro.widevine.cert'. On other embedded platforms, examine firmware directories or DRM service configurations for Widevine TA files or services.Affected if The Widevine TA component is installed or the device advertises Widevine DRM capabilities.
-
Determine if user input processing is reachable through WidevineAssess whether the device processes protected media content through the Widevine DRM pipeline. This can be confirmed by checking if the device can play Widevine-protected streams (e.g., L1 or L3) or by examining active DRM sessions via 'dumpsys media.drm' or equivalent DRM debugging interfaces.Affected if The device processes or is capable of processing Widevine-protected content, enabling the attack surface for the vulnerable TA.
-
Check for installed firmware/security patch levelQuery the installed firmware version and security patch date. On Android this is typically available via 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch', 'getprop ro.vendor.build.version.security_patch', or in Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level. For other firmware-based devices, consult vendor-specific diagnostic interfaces or boot logs.Affected if The security patch level predates the CVE-2020-11293 fix release date (approximately mid-2020) or the firmware remains at the original vendor version with no documented CVE remediation applied.
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Apq8064au, Apq8096au, Aqt1000, Ar8031, Ar8035) and has the Widevine TA component enabled while running firmware without the CVE-2020-11293 security patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware/security updates from Qualcomm and device OEMs that patch the Widevine TA component. Users should ensure devices receive regular security patches.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-11293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-11293 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data