CVE-2020-11844
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Container Deployment Foundation component affects products: - Hybrid Cloud Management. Versions 2018.05 to 2019.11. - ArcSight Investigate. versions 2.4.0, 3.0.0 and 3.1.0. - ArcSight Transformation Hub. versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0. - ArcSight Interset. version 6.0.0. - ArcSight ESM (when ArcSight Fusion 1.0 is installed). version 7.2.1. - Service Management Automation (SMA). versions 2018.05 to 2020.02 - Operation Bridge Suite (Containerized). Versions 2018.05 to 2020.02. - Network Operation Management. versions 2017.11 to 2019.11. - Data Center Automation Containerized. versions 2018.05 to 2019.11 - Identity Intelligence. versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Container Deployment Foundation component. The flaw allows unauthorized access to the container deployment infrastructure, enabling attackers to bypass authentication controls and gain privileged access to the foundation layer that manages container deployments across multiple enterprise products.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2018.05= 2018.08= 2018.11= 2019.02= 2019.05= 2019.08= 2019.11= 2020.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Service Management Automation versionCheck the product version through the system management console, About page, or version info command specific to Micro Focus Service Management Automation. Common locations include the administrative UI or system information files in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version matches any of: 2018.05, 2018.08, 2018.11, 2019.02, 2019.05, 2019.08, 2019.11, or 2020.02
-
Verify Container Deployment Foundation component is presentInspect the installed components or modules within the Service Management Automation environment. Look for the Container Deployment Foundation component in the product's component list or installed services.Affected if Container Deployment Foundation is installed as part of the Service Management Automation deployment
-
Check authentication configuration for Container Deployment FoundationReview the authentication and access control configuration files or settings specific to the Container Deployment Foundation component. Look for authorization policies that control access to the deployment infrastructure.Affected if Authentication controls are misconfigured or weak authorization policies are in place for the Container Deployment Foundation component
-
Inspect access controls for the foundation layerExamine the access control lists, role definitions, or permission settings that govern access to the foundation layer managing container deployments. Check for any overly permissive or misaligned access rules.Affected if The foundation layer has permissive access rules that could allow unauthorized privileged access
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed Service Management Automation versions (2018.05 through 2020.02) with the Container Deployment Foundation component enabled and exposed to unauthorized access due to incorrect authorization controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches or updates to move beyond the vulnerable version ranges. Review access controls and audit authorization policies in the Container Deployment Foundation after patching.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-11844 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-11844 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data