Psoc 4.2 BleApplication · Cypress

CVE-2020-11957

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.64 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Bluetooth Low Energy implementation in Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component versions before 3.64 generates a random number (Pairing Random) with significantly less entropy than the specified 128 bits during BLE pairing. This is the case for both authenticated and unauthenticated pairing with both LE Secure Connections as well as LE Legacy Pairing. A predictable or brute-forceable random number allows an attacker (in radio range) to perform a MITM attack during BLE pairing.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component versions before 3.64 generate the Pairing Random number with significantly less entropy than the required 128 bits during BLE pairing. This affects both LE Secure Connections and LE Legacy Pairing in authenticated and unauthenticated scenarios. The insufficient entropy makes the random number predictable or brute-forceable, enabling a man-in-the-middle attack by an attacker within radio range.

MitigationUpgrade Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component to version 3.64 or later to ensure proper 128-bit entropy in the Pairing Random number generation during BLE pairing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Psoc 4.2 BleApplication
Affected:< 3.64

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cypress PSoC BLE component usage
    Review your project source code and confirm it uses the Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component for Bluetooth Low Energy communication. Check your project configuration files or component declarations for references to BLE stack or library files.
    Affected if Your firmware or application explicitly uses the Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component
  2. Locate the BLE component version
    In PSoC Creator, open the project and navigate to the Components tab orRight-click the BLE component in the TopDesign schematic and select ' datasheet' or 'version information'. Alternatively, check the component manifest file in your project directory for the BLE component version number.
    Affected if The BLE component version shown is below 3.64
  3. Verify project dependencies
    Check the project's cycomponentlibrary.xml or similar manifest file that lists all embedded component versions. Look for entries containing 'BLE' or 'bluetooth' and note the associated version field.
    Affected if The listed BLE component version is less than 3.64
  4. Confirm BLE pairing is enabled
    Review your BLE component configuration in PSoC Creator (typically in the BLE tab of the Design Wide Resources file). Verify that either LE Secure Connections or LE Legacy Pairing is enabled in the security settings.
    Affected if BLE pairing is enabled and the component version is below 3.64

You are affected if your project uses the Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component at a version lower than 3.64 and BLE pairing (either LE Secure Connections or LE Legacy) is enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.64 or later
Fixed in 3.64
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Cypress PSoC Creator BLE 4.2 component to version 3.64 or later to ensure proper 128-bit entropy in the Pairing Random number generation during BLE pairing.

Fix this in Psoc 4.2 Ble Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,120
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-11957 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-11957 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data