CVE-2020-11973
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Camel Netty enables Java deserialization by default. Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.0, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0 are affected. 2.x users should upgrade to 2.25.1, 3.x users should upgrade to 3.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Camel Netty component enables Java deserialization by default, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending malicious serialized objects through the Netty transport. This unauthenticated deserialization vulnerability has a CVSS 9.8 critical rating due to the ease of exploitation and complete system compromise potential.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.22.0, <= 2.25.0>= 3.0.0, <= 3.1.0>= 8.0.0, <= 8.5.0= 13.3.0.0= 13.4.0.0= 12.0.0= 12.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Camel installation and versionLocate the Apache Camel jar files (typically in the application lib directory or Maven dependencies) and check the camel-core or specific Camel version. Run: java -jar yourapp.jar --version, check pom.xml, or inspect the camel-core jar manifest.Affected if The installed version is >= 2.22.0 and <= 2.25.0, OR >= 3.0.0 and <= 3.1.0
-
Confirm Netty component is in useSearch your application configuration for references to the Netty component, such as 'netty:http', 'netty:tcp', or 'netty:udp' in routes or endpoint URIs. Check route XML files, Java DSL code, or Spring configuration for netty component usage.Affected if Any Netty-based endpoint is configured in your Camel routes
-
Check Netty deserialization configurationInspect your Camel route or endpoint configuration for the Netty component. Look for settings like 'allowJavaSerialization=true' or 'serializationType=java' in the Netty endpoint URI parameters. Default behavior enables Java deserialization in affected versions.Affected if Java deserialization is not explicitly disabled in the Netty endpoint configuration (the default setting in affected versions enables it)
-
Verify network exposure of Netty endpointsCheck if Netty-based endpoints are bound to accessible network interfaces (0.0.0.0 or public IPs) rather than localhost. Review your host firewall rules and endpoint URI host bindings.Affected if Netty endpoints are exposed on network interfaces accessible from untrusted networks
You are affected if Apache Camel versions 2.22.0-2.25.0 or 3.0.0-3.1.0 are running with the Netty component and Java deserialization remains enabled (the default), especially if the endpoint is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Apache Camel to version 2.25.1 (for 2.x users) or 3.2.0 (for 3.x users). If immediate upgrade is not feasible, disable Java deserialization in the Netty component configuration or implement network-level filtering.
2.25.1 for 2.x users; 3.2.0 for 3.x users
- 1. Identify all applications and dependencies using Apache Camel Netty component versions 2.22.0 through 2.25.0 or 3.0.0 through 3.1.0
- 2. For Camel 2.x users: Upgrade Apache Camel dependency to version 2.25.1 or later
- 3. For Camel 3.x users: Upgrade Apache Camel dependency to version 3.2.0 or later
- 4. Rebuild and redeploy all affected applications with the upgraded Camel libraries
- 5. Verify the upgrade does not introduce regressions in existing integration workflows
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-11973 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-11973 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data