CVE-2020-12011
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA specially crafted communication packet sent to the affected systems could cause a denial-of-service condition or allow remote code execution. This issue affects: Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 version 4.02C (10.95.208.31) and earlier, all versions; MC Works32 version 3.00A (9.50.255.02); ICONICS GenBroker64, Platform Services, Workbench, FrameWorX Server version 10.96 and prior; GenBroker32 version 9.5 and prior.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA specially crafted communication packet sent to affected Mitsubishi Electric MC Works (32/64-bit) and ICONICS GenBroker/Platform Services/Workbench/FrameWorX Server software can cause denial of service or enable remote code execution due to improper handling of network communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.95.208.31= 9.50.255.02all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mitsubishi Electric MC Works versionCheck the installed version of MC Works or MC Works32 via the Windows Add/Remove Programs panel, or look in the installation directory for version information files. Common locations: C:\Program Files\Mitsubishi Electric\MC Works\ or check registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Mitsubishi Electric\MC WorksAffected if Version is <= 10.95.208.31 (for MC Works) or exactly 9.50.255.02 (for MC Works32)
-
Identify installed ICONICS software productsCheck Windows Add/Remove Programs for installed ICONICS products including GenBroker, Platform Services, Workbench, FrameWorX Server, Energy Analytix, Facility Analytix, Genesis64, Hyper Historian, MobileHMI, or Quality Analytix. Also check the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\ICONICS\)Affected if Any ICONICS product from the affected list is installed (note: the CVE states all versions are affected)
-
Verify if GenBroker service is runningOpen Windows Services console (services.msc) and look for 'ICONICS GenBroker' service, or use command: sc query GenBroker. Also check Task Manager for genbroker.exe processAffected if GenBroker service exists and is running - this is the primary affected component for ICONICS
-
Check network exposure of affected servicesUse netstat -an to list listening ports. Look for ports associated with ICONICS services (commonly ports 80, 443, or custom ports). Check firewall rules and network segmentation to determine if these services are accessible from outside the local networkAffected if The affected software network services are listening on exposed network interfaces accessible from untrusted networks
-
Verify Platform Services or FrameWorX Server presenceCheck Windows Services for 'ICONICS Platform Services' or 'FrameWorX Server' services. These may run as Windows services and can be queried via: sc query type= service state= all | findstr -i "ICONICS" or "FrameWorX"Affected if These ICONICS services are installed and running
Your environment is affected if you have any version of the listed ICONICS products installed, or Mitsubishi MC Works version <= 10.95.208.31 or exactly 9.50.255.02, and these services are network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches or updates to the affected software versions immediately. Implement network segmentation and restrict external access to affected ICS/OT systems to limit attack surface.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12011 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data