CVE-2020-12069
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn CODESYS V3 products in all versions prior V3.5.16.0 containing the CmpUserMgr, the CODESYS Control runtime system stores the online communication passwords using a weak hashing algorithm. This can be used by a local attacker with low privileges to gain full control of the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCODESYS V3 products (versions prior to V3.5.16.0) with the CmpUserMgr component store online communication passwords using a weak hashing algorithm. A local attacker with low-privilege access can exploit this to recover passwords and gain full control of the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 3.5.17< 3.5.16.0< 3.5.16.0< 3.5.16.0< 3.5.16.0< 3.5.16.0< 3.5.16.0< 3.5.16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CODESYS V3 runtime versionLocate the CODESYS runtime installation or runtime package version. Check system info, runtime logs, or product documentation for the exact version number (for example, look in /etc/codesys3, Program Files/CODESYS, or the device's web interface).Affected if The installed version is prior to V3.5.16.0 (or for Pilz Pmc, prior to V3.5.17).
-
Confirm CmpUserMgr component is presentInspect the CODESYS runtime configuration or component list to verify the CmpUserMgr (User Manager) component is loaded. Check runtime configuration files (for example, CmpUserMgr.cfg) or the component overview in the CODESYS Development System under 'Project' > 'Device' > 'Scan' or in the runtime's system information.Affected if The CmpUserMgr component is active in the runtime.
-
Check if online communication is configuredReview the CODESYS runtime settings for online communication options (remote login, web visualization, or network interfaces). Look for configuration entries enabling remote or online access in the device's CODESYS settings or configuration file.Affected if Online communication (remote access) is enabled and user passwords are stored in the system.
-
Locate password storage files (if accessible)If you have file system access, search for user-related configuration or database files where passwords may be stored (for example, files in the CODESYS configuration directory containing user accounts or password hashes). Note: Do not open or analyze the hashes further, just confirm their presence.Affected if User management files containing password hashes are present on the system.
A system is affected if it runs a CODESYS V3 runtime version prior to V3.5.16.0 (or V3.5.17 for Pilz) with the CmpUserMgr component and has online communication enabled, as this combination allows weak password hash storage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.5.16.03.5.17
Upgrade CODESYS V3 to version V3.5.16.0 or later which implements stronger password hashing. Additionally, restrict physical and logical access to the device and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
V3.5.16.0 (or 3.5.17 for Pmc)
- 1. Identify the specific CODESYS V3 product in use (e.g., Control for Linux, Control for PFC200, etc.)
- 2. Check the current installed version of the CODESYS Control runtime system
- 3. For Pmc products: upgrade to version 3.5.17 or later
- 4. For all other affected products (Beaglebone, Empc A/imx6, IoT2000, Linux, Pfc100, Pfc200, Plcnext): upgrade to version 3.5.16.0 or later
- 5. After upgrade, verify that the CmpUserMgr component is updated and online communication passwords are now stored using a stronger hashing algorithm
- 6. Consider changing all online communication passwords after the upgrade to ensure the new hashing is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12069 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data