Twincat DriverApplication · Beckhoff

CVE-2020-12494

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1.0.3603 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Beckhoff's TwinCAT RT network driver for Intel 8254x and 8255x is providing EtherCAT functionality. The driver implements real-time features. Except for Ethernet frames sent from real-time functionality, all other Ethernet frames sent through the driver are not padded if their payload is less than the minimum Ethernet frame size. Instead, arbitrary memory content is transmitted within in the padding bytes of the frame. Most likely this memory contains slices from previously transmitted or received frames. By this method, memory content is disclosed, however, an attacker can hardly control which memory content is affected. For example, the disclosure can be provoked with small sized ICMP echo requests sent to the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The TwinCAT RT network driver for Intel 8254x/8255x NICs fails to pad Ethernet frames with payload below the minimum 64-byte frame size. Instead, the driver leaks arbitrary memory content (likely from previous frame buffers) into the padding bytes, enabling information disclosure through crafted small ICMP echo requests.

MitigationApply Beckhoff vendor patch for TwinCAT RT driver; implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices; validate frame padding behavior post-patch.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Twincat DriverApplication
Affected:<= 3.1.0.3603
TwincatApplication
Affected:<= 3.1.0.3512<= 2.11.0.2120<= 3.1.0.3600<= 3.1.0.3500<= 2.11.0.2117

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm TwinCAT installation
    Look for Beckhoff TwinCAT software on the system. Check Program Files for Beckhoff folder or check Windows Services for TwinCAT-related services.
    Affected if TwinCAT software is present on the system
  2. Identify TwinCAT version
    Check the installed TwinCAT version through Beckhoff TwinCAT Build Information tool, or check the file version of TcRuntime.exe or other TwinCAT binaries in the installation directory.
    Affected if Installed version matches or is lower than any of the affected version ranges: 3.1.0.3603, 3.1.0.3512, 2.11.0.2120, 3.1.0.3600, 3.0.3500, or 2.11.0.2117
  3. Identify network adapter hardware
    Check Windows Device Manager for Intel 8254x or 8255x network adapters, or run 'ipconfig /all' to list network interfaces and note the adapter description.
    Affected if An Intel 8254x or 8255x NIC is present and in use
  4. Verify RT driver configuration
    Open TwinCAT Engineering (Visual Studio plug-in or TwinCAT System Manager), navigate to the network adapter configuration, and check if TwinCAT RT (real-time) driver is bound to the Intel 8254x/8255x adapter.
    Affected if TwinCAT RT network driver is bound to an Intel 8254x/8255x NIC

The system is affected if TwinCAT is installed with a version within the affected ranges and a TwinCAT RT driver is bound to an Intel 8254x or 8255x network adapter, allowing information disclosure via crafted small ICMP packets.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1.0.3603
Interim mitigation

Apply Beckhoff vendor patch for TwinCAT RT driver; implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices; validate frame padding behavior post-patch.

Fix this in Twincat Driver Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12494 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12494 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data