CVE-2020-12828
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in AnchorFree VPN SDK before 1.3.3.218. The VPN SDK service takes certain executable locations over a socket bound to localhost. Binding to the socket and providing a path where a malicious executable file resides leads to executing the malicious executable file with SYSTEM privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe AnchorFree VPN SDK before version 1.3.3.218 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability. The VPN SDK service binds to a localhost socket and accepts executable paths without proper validation. An attacker with local access can send a malicious executable path to this socket, causing the service to execute the file with SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3.3.218CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Pango or AnchorFree VPN SDK is installedReview installed software for applications that use the AnchorFree/Pango VPN SDK, such as Hotspot Shield, Betternet, or other VPN clients based on this SDK. Check Program Files directories for VPN-related executables from AnchorFree or Pango.Affected if Any VPN application using the AnchorFree/Pango VPN SDK is present on the system.
-
Determine the installed VPN SDK versionLocate the VPN SDK component files (typically named similarly to anchorservicemgr, pangoservicemgr, or vpncore related binaries) and check their version properties or file metadata. Compare the version number to 1.3.3.218.Affected if The installed SDK version is lower than 1.3.3.218.
-
Verify the VPN SDK service is runningCheck running services or processes for any VPN-related service (commonly named similar to AnchorFree Service, Pango Service, or the specific VPN client service). Use task manager or command-line tools like sc query or tasklist.Affected if A VPN SDK service is actively running on the system.
-
Check service network binding configurationInspect the running VPN service configuration to determine if it binds to a localhost socket (127.0.0.1). Use netstat or similar tools to identify listening ports associated with the VPN service.Affected if The VPN SDK service is bound to a localhost socket and accepts external input.
The system is affected if it runs any VPN application using the AnchorFree/Pango VPN SDK version prior to 1.3.3.218 with an exposed localhost service socket.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.3.218
Upgrade to AnchorFree VPN SDK version 1.3.3.218 or later which addresses the unsafe path handling. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict local access to the vulnerable service and monitor for suspicious process execution originating from the VPN SDK service.
1.3.3.218 or later
- 1. Identify all systems running AnchorFree VPN SDK (Virtual Private Network Software Development Kit)
- 2. Check the current version of the VPN SDK installed on each system
- 3. If the installed version is earlier than 1.3.3.218, download the updated VPN SDK version 1.3.3.218 or later from the vendor (www.pango.co)
- 4. Test the updated SDK in a non-production environment to verify compatibility
- 5. Apply the upgrade to production systems following standard change management procedures
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new version is 1.3.3.218 or later
- 7. Monitor systems for any abnormal behavior after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12828 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data