Zimbra Collaboration SuiteApplication · Synacor

CVE-2020-12846

HIGH · 8.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.8.15 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Zimbra before 8.8.15 Patch 10 and 9.x before 9.0.0 Patch 3 allows remote code execution via an avatar file. There is potential abuse of /service/upload servlet in the webmail subsystem. A user can upload executable files (exe,sh,bat,jar) in the Contact section of the mailbox as an avatar image for a contact. A user will receive a "Corrupt File" error, but the file is still uploaded and stored locally in /opt/zimbra/data/tmp/upload/, leaving it open to possible remote execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Zimbra Collaboration Suite versions before 8.8.15 Patch 10 and 9.x before 9.0.0 Patch 3 contain a file upload vulnerability in the /service/upload servlet of the webmail subsystem. The contact avatar upload feature does not properly validate file types, allowing users to upload executable files (exe, sh, bat, jar) disguised as avatar images. Although the UI displays a 'Corrupt File' error, the files are still saved to /opt/zimbra/data/tmp/upload/, creating a path for potential remote code execution.

MitigationApply Zimbra patch 8.8.15 Patch 10 or 9.0.0 Patch 3 to fix the file type validation in the contact avatar upload functionality, and audit/clean any existing malicious files in /opt/zimbra/data/tmp/upload/.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Zimbra Collaboration SuiteApplication
Affected:< 8.8.15= 8.8.15= 9.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Zimbra version
    Run 'zmcontrol -v' as the zimbra user or check the installed package version using 'rpm -q zimbra-pkg'
    Affected if Version is 8.8.15 (any patch level below 10), 9.0.0 (any patch level below 3), or any 9.x version below Patch 3
  2. Verify contact avatar upload feature accessibility
    Confirm the /service/upload servlet is reachable by attempting a local HTTP request to 'http://localhost:8080/service/upload' or checking the servlet is not disabled in the Zimbra configuration
    Affected if The servlet responds and is accessible
  3. Inspect upload temporary directory for suspicious files
    List all files in /opt/zimbra/data/tmp/upload/ using 'ls -la /opt/zimbra/data/tmp/upload/' and check for executable extensions
    Affected if Files with extensions .exe, .sh, .bat, or .jar are present in this directory
  4. Review webmail access logs for upload servlet activity
    Examine /opt/zimbra/log/nginx.access.log or the mailboxd access logs for POST requests to /service/upload, looking for unusual file types in the request body
    Affected if Logs show uploads of files with executable extensions to the avatar endpoint

A user is affected if their Zimbra installation version falls within the vulnerable range AND the contact avatar upload feature is accessible, with potentially malicious executable files present in the upload directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.8.15 or later
Fixed in 8.8.15
Interim mitigation

Apply Zimbra patch 8.8.15 Patch 10 or 9.0.0 Patch 3 to fix the file type validation in the contact avatar upload functionality, and audit/clean any existing malicious files in /opt/zimbra/data/tmp/upload/.

Fix this in Zimbra Collaboration Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12846 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12846 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data