CVE-2020-12946
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient input validation in ASP firmware for discrete TPM commands could allow a potential loss of integrity and denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient input validation in AMD ASP (Advanced Security Processor) firmware for discrete TPM (Trusted Platform Module) commands allows malformed or maliciously crafted TPM commands to be processed without proper validation, potentially causing integrity violations and denial of service conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.cCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor modelRun 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or use 'lscpu' to display CPU information. Look for the model name in the 'model name' or 'Model:' field.Affected if The CPU model is one of: Epyc 7f72, Epyc 7f52, Epyc 7f32, Epyc 7h12, Epyc 7742, Epyc 7702, Epyc 7702p, or Epyc 7662.
-
Query the ASP firmware versionUse IPMI or BMC tools to query the firmware version. Run 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <bmc_ip> -U <user> raw <command>' or check the BMC web interface firmware inventory for the ASP firmware component labeled 'romepi-sp3'. The version string will appear as romepi-sp3_X.Y.Z.Affected if The ASP firmware version is earlier than romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c (e.g., romepi-sp3_0.9.x or earlier).
-
Verify TPM is enabled and in useCheck if TPM is active by running 'ls /dev/tpm*' to list TPM device nodes, or run 'tpm2_getcap -l' if the TPM2 software stack is installed. Also check BIOS/UEFI settings for TPM enablement.Affected if A discrete TPM is enabled and the system processes TPM commands through the AMD ASP firmware.
-
Check TPM command activity logsReview system logs for TPM activity: 'journalctl -b | grep -i tpm' or '/var/log/messages' entries containing 'TPM'. Some BMCs also provide TPM event logs accessible via IPMI 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <bmc_ip> raw 0x04 0x08'.Affected if There are logged TPM command executions, indicating the attack surface is active.
You are affected if you run an AMD Epyc 7f32, 7f52, 7f72, 7h12, 7742, 7702, 7702p, or 7662 processor with ASP firmware version earlier than romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c and have a discrete TPM enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided firmware update/patch for ASP firmware when available; until then, restrict physical and software access to TPM interfaces and monitor for anomalous TPM command patterns.
romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version by checking the ASP firmware on the affected AMD Epyc system (typically via BIOS/UEFI settings or system management tools)
- 2. Navigate to the AMD website (www.amd.com) and locate the security advisory for CVE-2020-12946
- 3. Download the fixed firmware version romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c or later for your specific Epyc model (7f72, 7f52, 7f32, 7h12, 7742, 7702, 7702p, or 7662)
- 4. Apply the firmware update following AMD's standard firmware update procedures (typically through BIOS update, AMD firmware update utility, or system management interface)
- 5. Verify the firmware was successfully applied by checking the new firmware version
- 6. Reboot the system to ensure the new TPM firmware takes effect
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12946 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12946 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data