CVE-2020-13365
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain Zyxel products have a locally accessible binary that allows a non-root user to generate a password for an undocumented user account that can be used for a TELNET session as root. This affects NAS520 V5.21(AASZ.4)C0, V5.21(AASZ.0)C0, V5.11(AASZ.3)C0, and V5.11(AASZ.0)C0; NAS542 V5.11(ABAG.0)C0, V5.20(ABAG.1)C0, and V5.21(ABAG.3)C0; NSA325 v2_V4.81(AALS.0)C0 and V4.81(AAAJ.1)C0; NSA310 4.22(AFK.0)C0 and 4.22(AFK.1)C0; NAS326 V5.21(AAZF.8)C0, V5.11(AAZF.4)C0, V5.11(AAZF.2)C0, and V5.11(AAZF.3)C0; NSA310S V4.75(AALH.2)C0; NSA320S V4.75(AANV.2)C0 and V4.75(AANV.1)C0; NSA221 V4.41(AFM.1)C0; and NAS540 V5.21(AATB.5)C0 and V5.21(AATB.3)C0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA locally accessible binary in Zyxel NAS devices allows a non-root user to generate a password for an undocumented user account. This undocumented account can then be used to access TELNET as root, achieving full privilege escalation from an unprivileged local account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< v5.21\(aazf.9\)c0< v5.21\(aasz.5\)c0< v5.21\(aatb.6\)c0< v5.21\(abag.6\)c0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the NAS web interface and navigate to System > Firmware or use the CLI command 'cat /etc/zyxelfw_info' to retrieve the exact firmware version installed.Affected if The device is a Nas326, Nas520, Nas540, or Nas542 running firmware versions below 5.21(aazf.9)c0, 5.21(aasz.5)c0, 5.21(aatb.6)c0, or 5.21(abag.6)c0 respectively.
-
Verify TELNET service statusCheck if TELNET is enabled on the device via the web interface under Network > Remote Access or by attempting to connect to port 23. Also check /etc/services or run 'netstat -tlnp' to see if telnetd is listening.Affected if TELNET service is enabled and accessible, as the vulnerability enables root access through this protocol.
-
Locate the vulnerable binarySearch for the binary used to generate passwords for undocumented accounts. On the affected devices, this binary may be located in /usr/sbin or similar system directories. Use 'find /usr -name *pass*' or 'find /usr -name *user*' to locate related utilities.Affected if The binary exists on the system and is executable by non-root users, which is the condition required for exploitation.
-
Check for undocumented user accountsExamine /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow for unexpected accounts beyond the standard admin and guest accounts. Look for accounts that do not correspond to normal device usage.Affected if An undocumented account exists in the system, indicating the vulnerability may have been exploited or the password generation binary was used.
-
Review access logs for TELNET connectionsCheck system logs under /var/log or the web interface logs for any TELNET login attempts, especially from the undocumented account or at unusual times.Affected if TELNET connections from undocumented or unknown accounts appear in the logs.
The device is affected if it is a Nas326, Nas520, Nas540, or Nas542 running firmware below the specified versions AND TELNET is enabled, allowing an unprivileged local user to escalate to root via the undocumented account.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available firmware updates from Zyxel for the affected models. As an interim control, disable TELNET access and restrict local access to trusted users only.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-13365 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-13365 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data