Dsm NetinstApplication · Ivanti

CVE-2020-13793

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-08-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unsafe storage of AD credentials in Ivanti DSM netinst 5.1 due to a static, hard-coded encryption key.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Ivanti DSM netinst 5.1 stores Active Directory credentials using a static, hard-coded encryption key embedded in the application. This allows any attacker who obtains the key (through code review, binary analysis, or memory inspection) to decrypt all stored AD credentials, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the directory and downstream systems.

MitigationReplace the hard-coded encryption key with a properly managed key using a key management solution (HSM, key vault, or secure configuration), rotate all potentially exposed AD credentials, and implement proper key generation and storage practices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dsm NetinstApplication
Affected:= 5.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Ivanti DSM netinst version
    Check the installed version of Ivanti DSM netinst by examining the application binaries, installation directory, or running 'netinst --version' or checking the product information panel if a GUI is available
    Affected if Version is exactly 5.1 (note: only version 5.1 is listed as affected)
  2. Confirm Active Directory integration is configured
    Verify if the Ivanti DSM netinst instance is configured to store or manage Active Directory credentials. Check the application configuration files or management console for AD connector settings, credential storage, or directory integration modules
    Affected if AD integration is enabled and credentials are stored by the application
  3. Locate encryption-related binaries or libraries
    Examine the application installation directory for DLL, EXE, or JAR files related to encryption, credential storage, or security modules. Common paths may include the 'bin', 'lib', or 'security' subdirectories within the Ivanti installation folder
    Affected if Encryption binaries or libraries exist in the installation directory (indicates credential encryption is in use)
  4. Search for hard-coded encryption keys in application files
    Use strings, grep, or a hex editor to search application binaries for cryptographic key patterns, long hexadecimal strings, or known encryption-related keywords. Look for static key patterns in memory dumps or configuration export files
    Affected if A static, hard-coded encryption key is found embedded in the application binaries or configuration

You are affected if you are running Ivanti DSM netinst version 5.1 with Active Directory integration enabled and the application contains a hard-coded encryption key used for credential storage.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace the hard-coded encryption key with a properly managed key using a key management solution (HSM, key vault, or secure configuration), rotate all potentially exposed AD credentials, and implement proper key generation and storage practices.

Fix this in Dsm Netinst Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-13793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-13793 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data