CVE-2020-13927
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe previous default setting for Airflow's Experimental API was to allow all API requests without authentication, but this poses security risks to users who miss this fact. From Airflow 1.10.11 the default has been changed to deny all requests by default and is documented at https://airflow.apache.org/docs/1.10.11/security.html#api-authentication. Note this change fixes it for new installs but existing users need to change their config to default `[api]auth_backend = airflow.api.auth.backend.deny_all` as mentioned in the Updating Guide: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.11/UPDATING.md#experimental-api-will-deny-all-request-by-default
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Apache Airflow Experimental API had an insecure default configuration where all API requests were allowed without authentication. This created an authentication bypass vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive Airflow data, execute DAGs, and potentially pivot to other systems. Version 1.10.11 changed the default to deny all requests, requiring explicit authentication configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.10.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Airflow versionRun `airflow version` or `pip show apache-airflow` to see the installed version numberAffected if The version is less than 1.10.11 (e.g., 1.10.10, 1.10.9, 1.10.8, etc.)
-
Locate the Airflow configuration fileFind airflow.cfg typically in $AIRFLOW_HOME directory, or check for environment variable AIRFLOW_CONFIG pointing to the config fileAffected if You cannot locate the configuration file to verify API settings
-
Verify API authentication backend settingOpen airflow.cfg and look for the `[api]` section. Check the `auth_backend` setting under that sectionAffected if The `auth_backend` is not set (commented out or missing) OR is set to a permissive backend like `airflow.api.auth.backend.basic_auth` without proper authentication configured, AND the version is below 1.10.11
-
Check if Experimental API is enabledIn airflow.cfg, look for `enable_experimental_api` under the `[api]` section or check if the API is accessible on port 8080/airflow/api/experimental/Affected if `enable_experimental_api` is set to True AND the version is below 1.10.11 with no auth_backend configured
You are affected if running Airflow version below 1.10.11 with the Experimental API enabled and no explicit auth_backend configured in airflow.cfg - this means unauthenticated API access is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.10.11
Existing Airflow deployments must update their configuration to set `[api]auth_backend = airflow.api.auth.backend.deny_all` or configure an appropriate authentication backend (like kerberos, jwt, or basic auth) before restarting the Airflow services.
1.10.11
- Upgrade Apache Airflow to version 1.10.11 or later
- For existing installations, verify or set `[api]auth_backend = airflow.api.auth.backend.deny_all` in the airflow.cfg configuration file
- Restart all Airflow services (webserver, scheduler, worker) to apply the configuration changes
- If API access is needed, configure an appropriate auth backend such as `airflow.api.auth.backend.basic_auth` or `airflow.api.auth.backend.kerberos_auth`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-13927 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-13927 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data