CVE-2020-14300
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe docker packages version docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7 as released for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras via RHBA-2020:0053 (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0053) included an incorrect version of runc that was missing multiple bug and security fixes. One of the fixes regressed in that update was the fix for CVE-2016-9962, that was previously corrected in the docker packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras via RHSA-2017:0116 (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0116). The CVE-2020-14300 was assigned to this security regression and it is specific to the docker packages produced by Red Hat. The original issue - CVE-2016-9962 - could possibly allow a process inside container to compromise a process entering container namespace and execute arbitrary code outside of the container. This could lead to compromise of the container host or other containers running on the same container host. This issue only affects a single version of Docker, 1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30, shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Both earlier and later versions are not affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRed Hat's docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7 package for RHEL 7 included a version of runc that was missing the fix for CVE-2016-9962, a security regression from a previously fixed state (RHSA-2017:0116). This could allow a containerized process to escape and execute arbitrary code on the container host or compromise other containers on the same host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.13.1= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the operating system is RHEL 7Run 'cat /etc/redhat-release' or 'hostnamectl' to confirm the OS version is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.xAffected if The OS is not RHEL 7.x, then this specific vulnerability does not apply
-
Check if Docker package is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep docker' or 'rpm -q docker' to list installed docker packagesAffected if Docker is not installed at all, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Identify the exact Docker package versionRun 'rpm -q --queryformat "%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}" docker' or check the full package name with 'rpm -qa | grep -i docker' to get the exact version-release string (e.g., docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7)Affected if The installed version is docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7 exactly - this is the only version confirmed affected
-
Confirm Docker daemon is runningRun 'systemctl status docker' or 'docker version' to verify the Docker daemon is active and containers can be spawnedAffected if Docker daemon is not running, the container escape cannot be exploited though the vulnerable binary is still present
-
Check the runc version if accessibleRun 'runc --version' if runc is installed separately, though in this specific package docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7 the runc binary is bundled and the version may not be directly queryableAffected if Unable to determine runc version indicates it is the bundled version from the affected docker package
You are affected only if you are running RHEL 7 with the exact package version docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7 installed and the Docker daemon is operational.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a later Docker version or roll back to the earlier fixed version (before docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7) since only this single specific version is affected.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-14300 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-14300 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data